Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Wall street Journal story about how $65 oil will affect the airlines

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Wall street Journal story about how $65 oil will affect the airlines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Aug 2005, 23:31
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: North America
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wall street Journal story about how $65 oil will affect the airlines

article appearing in The Wall Street Journal regards sky- high oil prices specifically affecting airline profits.
It was sent (e-mailed) to me this AM and
I almost swallowed my coffee cup in reading the numbers quoted !
For example, if oil hits $65.00 per barrel (vs $45.00 per barrel), North West's 2006 estimated net income goes from PLUS $315 million to MINUS $750 million !
Delta, from -$425 million to -$1623 !
The other 8 carriers shown in the article's chart are proportionately just as badly affected and it's anyone's guess where it's all going to end.

Any one have access to this paper and able to post story here? I am not a subscriber so I do not have access.
Flatface is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2005, 01:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: NZ
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Big deal. All they have to do is raise fares proportionately - if they all do it, nobody loses a competitive advantage.

Airlines in the Southern Hemisphere have already started to raise or add a fuel surcharge - in the end, the customers will pay.

'Twas ever thus, as a brief review of history will tell you.
Raw Data is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2005, 03:28
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Both Qantas and Cathay Pacific have added fuel surcharges to every ticket. They give very good service, and charge proper fares for it. Until the US airlines realise that surly, overweight cabin staff, and inadaquete service and food are no longer good enough, they will continue to lose large amounts of money. (sorry about the 'overweight' comment...but, well, you know...). If BA, CX, QF and many other airlines make almost RECORD profits over the last year, then perhaps the US carriers had better understand what the difference is, and start to apply it to their operations. Selling your tickets for less than cost, and chasing each other down into oblivion is not the best business model I have ever heard of. You have to wonder just what good US business school MBA's really are....?
water check is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2005, 03:53
  #4 (permalink)  

Eight Gun Fighter
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Western Approaches
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah we've got fuel surcharges here as well. Had them for years, it seems. They keep getting larger - nothing ever goes down. So, increased ticket costs will knock out 2-3% of the punters but if the economies keep performing, people will still be flying - after all what ship are you going to book to get from Australia to Britain.

I'm more worried about China's insatiable appetite for oil products. I seem to remember that what kicked Japan off in the forties was being deprived of fuel.
Rollingthunder is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.