Virgin 747-400 - Ruby Tuesday
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: England
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Virgin 747-400 - Ruby Tuesday
Hi All,
Just a quick question - was on a flight to LA from LHR recently (my first with Virgin) and the a/c was Ruby Tuesday (sorry not got the reg). The interior seemed quite tired and the IFE was not what I had expected from Virgin ie on demand movies, nice big screens etc. Not having a dig at Virgin here at all as the flight was good, efficient and friendly cabin crew and the quality of the food was very good for economy. Was just curious to know if Ruby Tuesday is typical of the Virign fleet or if it is one of the "older" a/c and is in line for an upgrade IFE and seating etc?
Thanks in advance!
Fingers
Just a quick question - was on a flight to LA from LHR recently (my first with Virgin) and the a/c was Ruby Tuesday (sorry not got the reg). The interior seemed quite tired and the IFE was not what I had expected from Virgin ie on demand movies, nice big screens etc. Not having a dig at Virgin here at all as the flight was good, efficient and friendly cabin crew and the quality of the food was very good for economy. Was just curious to know if Ruby Tuesday is typical of the Virign fleet or if it is one of the "older" a/c and is in line for an upgrade IFE and seating etc?
Thanks in advance!
Fingers
Aircraft built 1998, reg is G-VXLG.
I have always noticed how tatty Virgin let the interiors of their fleet get. Recall going Upper Class for the first time ever, that must have been about 1998 as well, and finding so many of the little electronic seat switches for various functions were rubbed through or hanging off, and similar "tired" appearence compared to (say) BA whose aircraft interiors have always seemed immaculate, even at the end of their lives.
Sorry all at Virgin. It's true.
I have always noticed how tatty Virgin let the interiors of their fleet get. Recall going Upper Class for the first time ever, that must have been about 1998 as well, and finding so many of the little electronic seat switches for various functions were rubbed through or hanging off, and similar "tired" appearence compared to (say) BA whose aircraft interiors have always seemed immaculate, even at the end of their lives.
Sorry all at Virgin. It's true.
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I flew VS in February ('VROM/Barbarella - out and back) and found them superb. Really wonderful experience. I had Premium Economy on the way back, which was very nice. A really, really nice airline to fly with and interiors were clean and very respectable. I've always got the impression that they put a lot of thought into this; they were, in fairness, among the very first airlines to put PTVs into Y class.
A340-600s have the larger PTV screens.
Very happy memories of flying on Ruby Tuesday, back in the good old days - did an article for Airways magazine on a flight to EWR. Unforgettable experience - particularly so as I can't go "up front" anymore.
A340-600s have the larger PTV screens.
Very happy memories of flying on Ruby Tuesday, back in the good old days - did an article for Airways magazine on a flight to EWR. Unforgettable experience - particularly so as I can't go "up front" anymore.
Well I think I've been with them on the odd occasion since as well ! Maybe in all classes.
The seating pitch in Y always seems the tightest around, in the days of MRTC on American I used to wonder how VS could be competitive on transatlantic routes for regular Y travellers where fares were often comparable. The same goes for Hong Kong where comparable trips in Y on Virgin and Cathay have shown me the difference.
So many go on about the in flight entertainment but, like many on PPRuNe I suspect, I just snap on the Airshow map and that's it. Actually if you walk down the cabin the same seems to be true for many others. But then I'm probably an oddball. I don't like the Upper Class Suites either.
The seating pitch in Y always seems the tightest around, in the days of MRTC on American I used to wonder how VS could be competitive on transatlantic routes for regular Y travellers where fares were often comparable. The same goes for Hong Kong where comparable trips in Y on Virgin and Cathay have shown me the difference.
So many go on about the in flight entertainment but, like many on PPRuNe I suspect, I just snap on the Airshow map and that's it. Actually if you walk down the cabin the same seems to be true for many others. But then I'm probably an oddball. I don't like the Upper Class Suites either.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: planet earth
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Virgin Atlantic premium product is second to none, the new upper class is superb, the premium economy good. To be fair economy seats (new ones) are awful. The seats are very very narrow and very upright the cushions have very little padding.
As for Virgin Atlantic, they indeed are a superb airline I just hope they change the economy seats.
Inflight entertainment is interactive on most of the aircraft and is being fitted to the ones without it.
Virgin is and will be my choice (except Y class).
As for Virgin Atlantic, they indeed are a superb airline I just hope they change the economy seats.
Inflight entertainment is interactive on most of the aircraft and is being fitted to the ones without it.
Virgin is and will be my choice (except Y class).
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Somerset
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree overall product is superb its really just economy and a few tweaks with the product here and there then with a change of attitude from some of our staff we really can be a great airline.
Take 3 rows of seats out is my suggestion it would help things considerably.
BRGDS
SJD
Take 3 rows of seats out is my suggestion it would help things considerably.
BRGDS
SJD
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FingersR & WHBM
Had a similar experience a couple of years ago on 'California Girl' MAN-ORL where the feeling was of a 'plane that had reached life expiry - found out later it was new to Qantas in 1974! Service standards not up to the usual for Virgin, crew didn't seem too bothered and spent much of the flight in the galley chatting. Turbulence was horrendous on last 2hrs of flight, CG reeked of full sick bags by the end of it! CG is still going as a freighter in Africa I think.
Had a similar experience a couple of years ago on 'California Girl' MAN-ORL where the feeling was of a 'plane that had reached life expiry - found out later it was new to Qantas in 1974! Service standards not up to the usual for Virgin, crew didn't seem too bothered and spent much of the flight in the galley chatting. Turbulence was horrendous on last 2hrs of flight, CG reeked of full sick bags by the end of it! CG is still going as a freighter in Africa I think.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NE ENGLAND
Posts: 957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and the a/c was Ruby Tuesday (sorry not got the reg). The interior seemed quite tired and the IFE was not what I had expected from Virgin
As for "Y" seat comfort, as far as I can see, regardless of the airline & less than 32" seat pitch with all 3 seats occupied long haul & you're in for a pretty uncomfortable ride irrespective of the "seat padding" & VS is no different to the many offerings I have experienced "over the pond" ie BA,CO,UA.
Though I am not now going to start on food & service !