Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Eujet cease operations/Manston(Merged)

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Eujet cease operations/Manston(Merged)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Jul 2005, 14:13
  #101 (permalink)  
TwoDots
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
My sympathies to all ... I was with Maersk/Duo at the end, so know what this feels like.

For what its worth, in a relatively short space of time, everyone who wanted a job got one ...

We has an excellent Flt Ops man at the time, who called all the airlines the day after the collapse, and many of them came to talk to us as a group ... holding recruitment days at our old HQ and a couple of airlines did roadshows for us etc ...

This kind of thing might be worth trying to organise.

Good luck
 
Old 27th Jul 2005, 14:24
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Up In The Sky...
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

Very sorry to hear about the end of EUJet.

I hope the flightdeck and all other staff involved will find alternate work very soon without too much trouble. All the best.
MorningGlory is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2005, 18:20
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why is it that PJ McGoldricks name is so often associated with small airlines that go out of business. He was invloved in the HeavyLift Cargo Airlines going down & TranAer. Is he someone who gets called in to assist in an attempt to try and recover, or just someone who comes in to help clean up? Either way I have seen 3 or 4 final 'Sorry Chaps' statements from PJ to ground staff and air crew, and had the misfortune to have been working for a couple at the time.
Jamesov Bondski is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2005, 18:26
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Everland
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Check now http://www.eujet.com

Sadly, all speculations were true
sidestickhumper is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2005, 20:30
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did Manston actually open for business today, I was speaking to someone briefly today who was there and it did not sound like it was open.
STN Ramp Rat is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2005, 21:39
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My sincere condolences to all at KIA and EU Jet for the news.

I recently went for a job in ATC at KIA and was awaiting a reply when I heard the news, so to some extent this has affected me directly.

The ATC staff were very pleasant and helpful when I was there, and I wish them the very best for the future.

A sad day for UK Aviation and UK AIrports.

ProcATCO is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2005, 21:41
  #107 (permalink)  
Jes
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Isle of Thanet
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For the nth time: the airport is open.
Jes is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2005, 21:44
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: EGMH..a down, not yet out, formerly awesome airfield
Age: 55
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air Atlanta were advised to fly their last 747 out by the weekend as it seems it may be their last chance.
Twitcher is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2005, 22:20
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: England
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good luck to all
B..
bakerloo is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2005, 23:40
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dublin
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Danger

So P.J. strikes again.

Another cunning plan to do things cheaply?

Oh no not another airline gone bust?

Ah well least I got the customers money.

Maybe someone in authority might now take a look at the back ground of people trying to run airlines before issuing licences.
DogsDiner is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2005, 06:34
  #111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: birmingham
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WHAY ARE YOU ALL SURPRISED?

I am amazed.

On a forum with so many people that could do a better job than the people who are actually trying to start airlines and run airlines, how is it that anyone in the aviation business is even slightly surprised by this.

It was a dead cert that Ejet could not work, just like DUO couldnt work.

One was never going to sell enough tickets from nowhere and the other would never sell ducks (DUO advertising).

I too am sorry that people will be thrown into unemployment. It is always sad, but I am sorry to say I posted on this back in about March or April. Told you so.
niceguy is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2005, 07:10
  #112 (permalink)  
Buzz off with BAF!!
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Essex England
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with Niceguy.

This was like watching a slow motion tram smash. Everyone knew it was inevitable from the beginning.

Unfortunately Manston does not have a catchment area that is sufficient to support a high frequency schedule service operation. In fact where is Manston's catchment area?

In the 60's and 70's when Invicta was in business it's limited success was based on IT charter flights where passengers were mainly coached to Manston. Those days are gone.

I wish Manston and it's staff a secure future, but I don't think it will come in the guise of a low-cost scheduled operator.
tilewood is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2005, 08:24
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting article in todays Telegraph about PJ, although most of the content already known.................

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...711086,00.html

dionysius is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2005, 08:36
  #114 (permalink)  
Jes
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Isle of Thanet
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Unfortunately Manston does not have a catchment area that is sufficient to support a high frequency schedule service operation.

In fact where is Manston's catchment area? Er, KENT, E SUSSEX AND S.E. LONDON. REMEMBER THE DICTUM - THERE IS NO CATCHMENT AREA FOR LOCO AIRLINES.

In the 60's [60s] and 70's [70s], when Invicta was in business it's [ITS] limited success was based on IT charter flights where passengers were mainly coached to Manston. Those days are gone. THE WHOLE AIRLINE BUSINESS HAS CHANGED. NEVERTHELESS, IN JULY 9,000 CHARTER PASSENGERS WERE COACHED FROM AND TO MANSTON.

I wish Manston and it's [ITS] staff a secure future, but I don't think it will come in the guise of a low-cost scheduled operator"

EUJ HAD SOME CRAZY ROUTES, BUT THERE WERE BANKERS. THEY STARTED TO GO UNDER BY REDUCING AMS AND MAN TO ONCE A DAY, DESTROYING A GROWING BUSINESS MARKET. THE PLANES WERE TOO BIG FOR MOST OF THE BUSINESS SERVICES, AND THEY RAN TOO MANY SUN SERVICES ON TOO MANY ROUTES.

BUT THE MAIN FACTOR IN EUJ'S DEMISE WAS YEARS OF FINANCIAL MISMANAGEMENT BY PLANESTATION - THE DEBT MOUNTAIN WAS TOO GREAT.

THE DEBT HAS NOW GONE. AN AIRPORT WITH GOOD FACILITIES IS AVAILABLE IN KENT, ONLY AN HOUR'S DRIVE FROM THAMES GATEWAY - WATCH THIS SPACE.
Jes is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2005, 08:46
  #115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I worked for EUjet and take exception with some of the comments expressed, like the comment about passengers loosing their money which they paid for future flights. We are all aware that EUjet only used passengers money after they had flown passengers therefore can get there money back.

I enjoyed my time working with some of the best people I had the privilege of working with.

Yes it was a long shot operating out of an airport that didn’t have an existing business but if there was no people in the world prepared to take a chance there would be very few jobs.

Yes EUjet didn’t develop fast enough but don’t for get it was the first year, fuel prices increased by 300% and the cargo business at the airport disappeared. Is it any wonder that PlaneStation had difficulties?

It was the failure of PlaneStation which brought EUjet down and this failure has been blamed on the PlaneStation’s Bank who wouldn’t support the company while property was been sold.

EUjet was controlled by PlaneStation as was the Airport; EUjet was run by Martin May and all the senior people reported to him. When the staff met management it was Martin they met not PJ McGoldrick who announced earlier in the year that he was resigning from the Board and reducing the time he would work for the company.

He became more involved towards the end (a good indication that things weren’t going great) and when the company stopped operating it was Stuart McGoldrick who talked to our people in Kent and I believe PJ did the same in Shannon.

There was no sign of the PlaneStation people
matching is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2005, 12:20
  #116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Clarty Waters, UK
Age: 58
Posts: 950
Received 65 Likes on 34 Posts
Yes EUjet didn’t develop fast enough but don’t for get it was the first year, fuel prices increased by 300% and the cargo business at the airport disappeared.
Didn't develop fast enough? What!! They were flying 20 odd routes less than a year after start up!!! What really killed them off was overambition - trying to be a major airline from day 1 when they really should have started with just a couple of destinations to see how well they worked. The cargo business that disappeared BTW - MK Airlines - was being handled at a loss by Planestation.
It was the failure of PlaneStation which brought EUjet down and this failure has been blamed on the PlaneStation’s Bank who wouldn’t support the company while property was been sold.
That's funny. A lot of people would have said the exact opposite - that it was the crippling losses racked up by EUjet that dealt a fatal blow to Planestation. The bank isn't a charity and shouldn't be expected to behave like one; they had already supported Planestation to the tune of £40 million or so; perhaps they were fed up throwing good money after bad.
Andy_S is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2005, 13:00
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NE ENGLAND
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the 60's and 70's when Invicta was in business it's limited success was based on IT charter flights
Ahh those were the days, loved their DC 4's !
skyman771 is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2005, 16:24
  #118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Under the flight path
Posts: 2,632
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
But even then, in the early 70s when Invicta acquired Vanguards and later still 707/720s, they based them at Luton for most of the charters. Presumably because that's where people wanted to fly from.
LGS6753 is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2005, 16:31
  #119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London Whipsnade Wildlife Park
Posts: 5,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Invicta only survived on the back of the UK Govt trooping contracts and the charter services flown in the main from Luton.
Buster the Bear is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2005, 17:31
  #120 (permalink)  
Buzz off with BAF!!
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Essex England
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If Manston has as much potential as Jes obviously thinks,then why haven't Easy or Ryanair staked a claim long ago?

Neither airline is slow when it spies an opportunity.

It comes back to what so many people have stated already
on this thread. Manston does not have a catchment area
that would sustain such an operation.

It is the 'bottom line' that counts these days, the banks and the accountants are king.
tilewood is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.