Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Cardiff Happenings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Jul 2005, 19:23
  #21 (permalink)  

Brunel to Concorde
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Virtute et Industria, et Sumorsaete Ealle
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WindSheer

As a pax I take a different view to the football supporter type of rhetoric some trot out in support of 'their' airport, and I don't mean you. But if you go to some threads re other UK airports you would be forgiven for thinking that airports are supported as passionately as the local football team.

I look upon airports as a facility for the public, a means of employment for many and an engine/mirror of the local economy or economies.

If I want to fly somewhere I will probably go to the nearest airport if the flight, price and timings are suitable. If not, I will look somewhere else and whether it is in Wales, the Midlands or London is of secondary importance to me.

Living in the Bristol/Cardiff region gives a passenger quite a choice. Apart from the airports serving these cities there are also BHX and LHR plus, especially for Bristol area people, EXT and even SOU.

My son often uses BHX for business, even though he lives in Bristol (he also flies frequently from there), because even though a flight to the detination he wants might be available from BRS the flight times can sometimes be inconvenient for him.

My Bristol neighbours regularly take their main summer holiday in the Spanish Costas but for the last four years have used CWL because the day/flight time suits them better than the one/s from BRS.

That is why I contend that as a customer I regard the Severnside airports (and beyond) as a complementary pool, and I am ready to take advantage of what suits me best on a particular occasion. Might that not also be the case with some Welsh travellers using BRS?

Finally, I'm sure you can answer this. How many stands has CWL currently got and how many could realistically be provided in the future? Thanks in advance for answer.
MerchantVenturer is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2005, 21:48
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Currently we have 10 dedicated stands plus Stand 1 where we are able to park several aircraft on at a time, three stands have air bridges. Additional parking space is available on taxiway E.
The new layout will allow for 6 more dedicated nose in stands, however the sky really is the limit for potential stands as i have previously mentioned. We have vast areas of grass which could be concreted over and made into stands plus the disused runway currently used as taxiways and additional parking during events.
MerchantVenturer I agree with you about the complimentary airports, if we can't get a flight from Cardiff then we tend to look to Bristol first. There is no doubt though that everyone would prefer to fly from the airport most local to them. For me to fly from Cardiff means a 20 minute Journey, to fly from Bristol about a 90 minute journey.
flower is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2005, 23:24
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: England
Posts: 14,999
Received 172 Likes on 66 Posts
Look its not hard. BRS sits in an area of significantly higher GDP then CWL. It therefore supports a significantly higher flying programme. Nothing to do with the terminal, the runway, the operators, the car parks or the national soil.

Cardiff is further hampered by the interference of the Welsh Assembly and their tax supported ilk who continue to dabble in economic affairs. They perverted reality to get the likes of the massive Sony and LG investments in South Wales which are now closed/closing. So they pervert the natural order by subsidising certain airlines and routes out of CWL which should never have been and never will flourish.

Thatcherism works. Nobody 'funded' Go/easyJet moving into BRS other than the banks and management. Here it is 4 years later as a runaway success.

Just shows.

Cheers

WWW
Wee Weasley Welshman is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2005, 07:00
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they pervert the natural order by subsidising certain airlines and routes out of CWL which should never have been and never will flourish.
Perhaps you would like to tell us whom the Welsh assembly fund and which routes instead of just spreading rumours you are unable to substantiate, Everyone else is on about how at last CWL is getting itself together , shame someone has to be so negative.
There is talk about the WAG funding a North South Wales service which has been utterly dismissed by people around here.
flower is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2005, 10:10
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: At Home
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are too many groups with a hand in the pot in Wales.

You have Britsih Government, Welsh Assembly, Welsh Development Agency & then City Council/County Councils. No one can get things done because they all want their say before anything gets done!

I believe that Baby do have some incentive from either the Assembly or WDA to run some of their routes.
On standby is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2005, 11:05
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Checked this out from the WAG ;

Andrew Davies: The main role of the Welsh Assembly Government and its agencies is to support TBI plc and Cardiff International Airport in making the case for Bmibaby to locate in Wales. The only financial assistance offered to the airline was for training, as allowed under European Commission and state aid rules.

The Wales Tourist Board will have an additional £841,000 for marketing initiatives to capitalise on new Bmibaby routes during 2002-04. This includes funding for the livery of one of Bmibaby’s Boeing 737s to promote the branding of Wales by carrying the Wales World Nation logo and the Wales Tourist Board’s web site address. That deal was secured on a purely commercial basis. There is no subsidy, underwriting or plan to recoup passenger revenues for this Bmibaby operation in Wales.
I have also checked to see if any other airlines were paid subsidies under their public accounting and found nothing.
flower is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2005, 12:17
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Live near Cardiff (from Scotland)
Age: 47
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The plans i`ve heard are that the domestic pier will come down to make room for a/c parking,grass between std 1 and echo will will not be completely concreted (about 20m will be used).The front of the terminal front will be extended out to be level with arrivals entrance(reasonable distance) the info desk will be moved down stairs and massive upstairs toilets will be scaled down to make more room.There were/are plans for a joint "emergancy response centre" for the police who will be relocated from the old pier and the AFRS who need a new station!A walkway of some sorts will also have to be created for pax to move between departure lounge and new parking area,this will be linked in with the bottom of international pier`s lower section being gutted out so this part will be open for pax to dep/arrive from.BUT this has not been approved!down to funding the money i guess.fingers crossed
pipertommy is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2005, 15:13
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes I had also heard about the partial concreting of the grass area Piper Tommy, I have also heard that access to the new stands for pax may be via a new route past Burger King , however i would have thought a ground level covered walkway would make more sense as you say.

TBI are spending a lot of money at the moment on the place and new elevators have been going in over the summer.

Are there plans for a new Fire Station ? would make sense after the money they spent on you these last couple of years
flower is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2005, 17:05
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Barajas
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CAT III wouldn't go a miss either. After all, Cardiff isn't immune to the odd bank of fog. Save some airlines deciding on BRS because they know they can get in.
Fernando_Covas is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2005, 17:47
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep agree on the lighting, missed opportunity when they resurfaced the runway this last year. The ILS is I understand already Cat 3 compliant the runway lighting however isn't.
flower is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2005, 20:03
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ישראל
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about lowering the price of sandwiches on the 1st floor.
No_Speed_Restriction is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2005, 21:57
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Barajas
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the runway lighting however isn't.
That bloody big tree still blocking some of the lighting on 30 end?
Fernando_Covas is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2005, 19:06
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Near sheep!
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Evening gents.

Are they really going to extend the front of the terminal outwards??
I assume it would start from the side of the new lifts, otherwise what a waste of money! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

I was talking to a couple of pilots last year re: CAT111 at CWL, their opinion was that they could not go for it because of the high ground to the NW. Sounds nonsense to me?
Runway lighting is never CAT111 standard on any runway until until you decide to get it installed. BRS is a good example with CAT111 on the one runway only. The lighting is different both ends, as CAT111 standard lighting on 09 would be a waste of dollar!

Anyway, I think they should build one huge airport in the severn - Hong Kong style! Put welsh and english staff in there to run the thing!


WindSheer is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2005, 09:16
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Wales
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Morning everyone,

I have to be honest, I find Cardiff's terminal quite pleasant. Granted, it needs a bit of a refurbishment here and there and in fairness the owners are doing a good job with the refurbishment.

The arrivals looks much better than it used to. What the terminal needs is a better departure lounge with a wider selection of shops and seating areas. The area by the KLM Lounge could do with a bit more there. Why not place 2/3 retail units there. For example; A boot's style store, clothing shop and maybe a fast food unit such as Mc Donalds.

I believe that they must also replace the horrible wood and metal paneling with glass or other see through material to give the passengers a view of the runway and the aircraft. Why not re-open the viewing area? I am sure that they could place one or two security personell there or maybe an armed police man or two.

As for the new routes...

I believe that the Zoom service to Toronto will continue to do well and I believe the new Vancouver route will do just as well and possibly allow further expansion of routes to Canada from CWL.

Excel Airways is bound to have a major impact on pax figures for CWL and also provide passengers with an alternative to BMIbaby and also a wider range of destinations.

The new Thomson routes should go down well... they normally do! However, I think CWL could do with a service to the USA. I guess that is out of the question for now with CO at BRS.

Is there any news on the EK rumor? I know that Air Wales are looking at re-operating BRU and opening another destination. By the way the routes Air Wales operate on behalf of BMIbaby are now on Air Wales' booking system.

Regards,
Chris
CWL_Chris is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2005, 13:11
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NE ENGLAND
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why not re-open the viewing area? I am sure that they could place one or two security personell there or maybe an armed police man or two.
Do you really believe this?
Not withstanding any security directives currently in place, could the cost be justified ?
skyman771 is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2005, 16:20
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They use the third floor now for a myriad of different uses so I am not even sure if there is easy access to the old viewing area. It is a shame it closed, I always thought the airport could have made more money by placing a coffee shop up there, especially in the summer it always used to be packed.
flower is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2005, 21:56
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: At Home
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe that CAT3 ps are out of the question due to the severe inclines at both ends of the runway. Just like 09 at BRS. Don't want to "terrain terrain pull up" on the approach!

Can't see the Airport stumping up any additional costs to open the viewing gallery.
On standby is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2005, 22:38
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Live near Cardiff (from Scotland)
Age: 47
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They do have plans for a new fire station but can`t see it happening in the near future(year or two),money could be spent on the terminal side rather than non productive investment`s.Which i guess i fair enough if it means a busier airport
pipertommy is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2005, 04:40
  #39 (permalink)  
Scourge of Bad Airline Management!
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Global Nomad
Age: 55
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
By the way the routes Air Wales operate on behalf of BMIbaby are now on Air Wales' booking system.
I'm not sure they are, you know. They seem to have loaded BFS and CDG into the web front end, but there is no inventory loaded that I can find.

Actually allowing 6G to sell WW inventory is not as easy as you'd think, either technically (they'll need to spend some quite serious money to do it properly) or commercially (how do you lock inventory in a live environment? How do you ensure that one site won't cannibalise yield? Why would WW want to do this when their web traffic is MASSIVELY higher than 6G's, and allowing 6G to sell - as a puppet operation, since they should not be allowed to set their own fares - would add very little if anything to the sales channel)?

I think this is a case of 6G wishful thinking.... was certainly not part of the thinking behind the agreement, I can tell you.

TA smells bulls**t and a shambles coming up....
TwinAisle is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2005, 13:06
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Pub
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you try and book a flight from CWL to ORK on the Air Wales website a icon will appear and tell you to go to directly to Bmibaby website to book the flight.
Stone Cold is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:41.


Copyright © MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.