Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Wind damage at Dublin

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Wind damage at Dublin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Jan 2005, 06:34
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Edinburgh, UK
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maxalt, anchors are possible! The nose and main gears have mooring points and once the aircraft is into wind, these could be used. It is in the maintenance manual. However to what do you attach the other end? There are only a handful of tugs available. However going this far should not be necessary to counteract even a severe gale. Mooring points usually required only for debogging.
avoman is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2005, 07:38
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Workmaster, your not in the airline industry are you ?? !
toon is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2005, 08:17
  #43 (permalink)  

Jolly Green Giant
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shouldn't it be the responsibility of flight ops in these cases?

They are monitoring the weather and will get severe weather warnings from Met Eireann as well. They then advise Engineering to move the aircarft accordingly.
OneWorld22 is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2005, 10:10
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on the fence
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA`s policy is to always leave the parking brake on , even on the airbus family which is opposite the airbus manual which recomends releasing the brakes when the a/c is chocked to allow for equal cooling .
5415N is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2005, 10:54
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: western europe
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MarkD, the story I heard was that without the "Action" your post mentions, one of the 330's involved in the incident would have been safely in/on its way to SNN

As the Aussies say "$$$$$$"

hobie is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2005, 11:02
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have some questions, which though technical, might well be answered here.

1. But, firstly, did anyone land/takeoff in these condiditons, and have they any pertinent information to pass on?

2. If landing on 28, and with the METAR W/V, you would need to turn right to vacate. This would be turning the a/c away from the natural weathercock effect. Has anyone experienced difficulty doing this? Was an into-wind aileron sufficient? Was differential thrust and/or braking required, and could the turn radius be maintained without skidding?
What thoughts about landing, even if zero x-wind, but in wet/slippery condiftions and then having to turn broad-side to vacate? Would you risk it?

3. What recommendations has anyone, about the position of elevator and stabiliser while taxing with such strong tail winds, and is this based on theory or experience. I've thought about the theory, but never, on big aeroplanes, ever encountered such wind strengths on the ground to put it into practice.

Many thanks

Last edited by RAT 5; 4th Jan 2005 at 17:45.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2005, 14:10
  #47 (permalink)  
The Cooler King
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: In the Desert
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I might try and put the METAR into X-Plane and see what the result is........but I suppose it will be inaccurate!
......God, I'm such a nerd
Farrell is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2005, 22:47
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dublin
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello all,
Only found out about this incident today...having formally worked for EI in DUB Station im damn curious...especially as im from malahide and wondering if my house is still there and not torn away to OZ.
Anyways...Just wondering if any price has been placed on the damage to the two aircraft. Did any other part of CRK hit anything else, it seems that at the angle surely the left wing should have hit the airbridge too.

As for workmasters comment....Mate...firstly, aerlingus doesnt consider itself a "national airline" anymore, its a low fares airline with high service, in that it IS looking after its affected passengers unlike what other low fares airlines might do...secondly, its new years day...where in hell is aerlingus meant to suppliment a third of its longhaul fleet, especially when most of the worlds spare aircraft are being sent to assist in the tsunami disaster relief in south east asia. Ignorance is a virtue in your house obviously!!!! You say you work in the airline....you must be management with an attitude like that!
apaddyinuk is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2005, 09:17
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: western europe
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aer Lingus doesn't consider itself a "national airline" anymore,
Any Airline that tried to introduce a "Ban" on repatriating National's "Coffins" for burial in the "Old Ground" were certainly giving up any claim to being a "National Airline"
(Public outrage forced a backtrack)

hobie is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2005, 09:50
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Far side of the moon left after the big crater
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And quite right too....

" I am sorry sir, your father is somewhere between CDG and LHR, do you have a limited release tag?"


apaddyinuk - Your house should be safe.. After collinstown being hit it made it's way to Blanch / Meath no other real damage north of the liffey..
DUBXH is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2005, 11:04
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: western europe
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dub, I do remember a few years ago, a coffin being strapped under a Chopper for a flight to the Aran Isles (after being flown into Shannon from the U.S.) ...... after set-down guess what?

yep, No Coffin

.... and they never did find it
hobie is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2005, 14:35
  #52 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hobie

hardly a ban. They simply didn't want the business which others were free to take up. Frankly as an emigrant myself I find all these people who left Ireland years ago but want to be buried in "d'auld sod" a bit weird.
MarkD is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2005, 15:08
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: western europe
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I find all these people who left Ireland years ago but want to be buried in "d'auld sod" a bit weird.
Well, I guess if they want to want to be laid to rest with their Parents/Grand Parents etc you can understand their wishes.

hardly a ban
http://www.irishabroad.com/news/iris...ROFITSDEAD.asp
Public pressure made it impossible for EI to maintain the Ban
hobie is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2005, 17:35
  #54 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hobie

I'd prefer to be with my wife (actual) and kids (if any) here in Canada thanks. If I didn't I don't have EI flights to take me "home" anyway.

The fact is EI implemented a no-cargo policy in accordance with what they felt was the way to go business wise. Private cargo haulers or bmi could have taken up the business. Government exerted pressure and they reversed.

Once private they will be able to do whatever is right for EI, unless the Government tries to pull an "Air Canada Public Participation Act" type stunt.

I actually feel getting out of cargo is bad news for EI and Ireland but am annoyed that the coffins seem to be more important than Ireland's exports!

That's all I have to say about this offtopic diversion - any news yet on how long it will take to return the 330s to service?
MarkD is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2005, 19:43
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm pretty sure that the 'coffin' issue was another nail in Willys....coffin!
I think it was a big wake up call to Bertie.
Willy just went wayyyy toooo far. Silly bugger.
Idunno is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2005, 21:50
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How did this evolve into an Air Lingus slaggng? It gives a whole new meaning to murphing!
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2005, 01:30
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the day in question there was also some very severe weather in the County Longford that also caused quite a bit of damage etc. Did not make the general news for some reason. Guess the Dublin hacks were not too interested?

Now, if it had been Cork!!
Tom the Tenor is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2005, 20:47
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's currently a B767-300 (don't know whose) operating EIN110 JFK to Shannon

Fried Chicken
Fried_Chicken is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.