BMI to lose 321`s and pull out of BHD
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on the fence
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BMI to lose 321`s and pull out of BHD
Just a rumour , but was told recently by a BMI duty manager at LHR that the LHR/BHD route was to be reviewed as the yeild was not comming up to forcast . One of the options being considered was pulling off the route altogether . Also BMI are considering giving back the 321`s in favour of more 319`s as the only route that they are usually full is BHD , hence the reason that they havn`t been repainted in the new colours .
This all could be just a rumour but the whole thing has lots of parrells with the run up the BA pulling out of BFS . I don`t work for BMI but commute with them and find them excellant . If this is true Belfast loses out on LHR tranfers and it makes it v.hard for me to go to work .
Any news would be apprec.
This all could be just a rumour but the whole thing has lots of parrells with the run up the BA pulling out of BFS . I don`t work for BMI but commute with them and find them excellant . If this is true Belfast loses out on LHR tranfers and it makes it v.hard for me to go to work .
Any news would be apprec.
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would think DUB produces pretty good A321 loads as well, but that said, EI is also said to be giving up on A321s as well.
If BMI were to pull off the Belfast route (either BFS or BHD), it would be quite a surprise; if they are filling 321s, then 319s or 320s should not be a problem - and at better yields. Presumably the reason the 321s are disappointing is that they have to sell a significant number of seats at bargain prices to achieve satisfactory loads.
As for ending Belfast-LHR altogether, the political reaction to this in NI would be vocal and HMG would be under intense pressure to find someone to keep it going. One possibility might be EI, although I think given the choice of flying EI to LHR from BFS, one good reverend might rather swimming and cycling
If BMI were to pull off the Belfast route (either BFS or BHD), it would be quite a surprise; if they are filling 321s, then 319s or 320s should not be a problem - and at better yields. Presumably the reason the 321s are disappointing is that they have to sell a significant number of seats at bargain prices to achieve satisfactory loads.
As for ending Belfast-LHR altogether, the political reaction to this in NI would be vocal and HMG would be under intense pressure to find someone to keep it going. One possibility might be EI, although I think given the choice of flying EI to LHR from BFS, one good reverend might rather swimming and cycling
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on the fence
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree it would be a surprise but so was BA`s decsion when it pulled off . As for the political reaction , many people will say that BFS/BHD is still well linked to LON with a variety of british airlines
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Greater Aldergrove
Age: 53
Posts: 851
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hope this isn't true. Only last year BMI had their 321s modified (software upgrades?) to allow fuller operation from BHD.
...and if BMI do pull out, would that leave an opportunity for the new slimline short-haul BA (complete with LoCo prices) to make a re-appearance? And would they take it?
...and if BMI do pull out, would that leave an opportunity for the new slimline short-haul BA (complete with LoCo prices) to make a re-appearance? And would they take it?
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Work associated address
Age: 42
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd certainly be surprised as BHD-LHR is supposeldy BMI's most popular route.Bear in mind aswell they have a complete monopoly to LHR aswell.Doubt they would drop the route myself specially seen as they have a daily flight to Belfast using an A320 so as they can keep the slot for Heathrow.
Regards
Regards
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on the fence
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BFS/BHD
I seem to remember that easyjet is a bigger operator and is the No 1 carrier out of belfast
However in this age of yeild and revenue management popular does not equal profitable ( no matter what the rest of us think )
PS the upgrades for the 321 where paid by airbus under the terms of the operators lease
I seem to remember that easyjet is a bigger operator and is the No 1 carrier out of belfast
I'd certainly be surprised as BHD-LHR is supposeldy BMI's most popular route
PS the upgrades for the 321 where paid by airbus under the terms of the operators lease
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Work associated address
Age: 42
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aswell as that though in business just because one "business" is not performing as the other "businesses" closure of the failing one will then lead the others to trouble,as even though it is loosing it provides a financial contribution to the whole business as a whole.Wow I do remember some of my business studies!!
Lol.
Lol.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe if they were to be able to operate the flights so that people could have a FULL day in London or further afield (the last departure from LHR is 1935...doesn't do a lot for connecting from Europe) then they might be better placed.As Bhd have said that they will NOT be pursuing the later opening times it would appear that they could consider a move back up the road........enter Allmcc stage left 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WW mentioned that EI might give up on 321s, Mark D. This was within the past few months - in fact, around the time the first of the new tranche of A320s was delivered.
With regard to Belfast having links to a number of UK airports, I really don't think that would hold water; the same thing was said about JER, when BA took our flights away. That's all well and good, but it's still a long, dull journey on the bus along the M25, which can often be a lengthy, delayed and tedious experience.
It's quite easily arguable that NI's economy could be badly hit by this. As I said, the political reaction to any proposal to cut routes would be pretty vocal.
With regard to Belfast having links to a number of UK airports, I really don't think that would hold water; the same thing was said about JER, when BA took our flights away. That's all well and good, but it's still a long, dull journey on the bus along the M25, which can often be a lengthy, delayed and tedious experience.
It's quite easily arguable that NI's economy could be badly hit by this. As I said, the political reaction to any proposal to cut routes would be pretty vocal.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UAE
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
5415n
Easyjet is indeed the largest carrier in NI but it neither operates out of Belfast nor operates into Heathrow. This is one of the reasons the Bhd-Lhr route is so succesful and I think if you investigate further you may find that the first morning dep is often oversubscribed with a high percentage buisness pax.
Eastern, nice to see you`re doing youre bit for the tree huggers by recycling old an worn out posts!! You have to leave us something to play with.
Easyjet is indeed the largest carrier in NI but it neither operates out of Belfast nor operates into Heathrow. This is one of the reasons the Bhd-Lhr route is so succesful and I think if you investigate further you may find that the first morning dep is often oversubscribed with a high percentage buisness pax.
Eastern, nice to see you`re doing youre bit for the tree huggers by recycling old an worn out posts!! You have to leave us something to play with.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Leave you something to play with.....I will not make any innuendos
As for Easyjet not flying from Belfast!! C'mon!!!
The principle reason the Bmi service is so popular is simply because it the ONLY one!!..even if it does get everyone home early ..... (last night excepted of course!!)
As for Easyjet not flying from Belfast!! C'mon!!!
The principle reason the Bmi service is so popular is simply because it the ONLY one!!..even if it does get everyone home early .....
(last night excepted of course!!)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on the fence
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tower R .
the vast majority of the eary mornig deps out of NI are quite full , not just BMI . Also a lot of the LHR pax are on company tickets , paid as a coporate rate which is less than the standard pax rate , again in this word pax numbers do not always equal profit . Each route is assessed over the whole spectrum and just because the yeild is high on one flt does not mean it is so for the whole route .
The average yeild on the 1st bfs/lhr ( when BA where here) was on average 79-87%
5415N
the vast majority of the eary mornig deps out of NI are quite full , not just BMI . Also a lot of the LHR pax are on company tickets , paid as a coporate rate which is less than the standard pax rate , again in this word pax numbers do not always equal profit . Each route is assessed over the whole spectrum and just because the yeild is high on one flt does not mean it is so for the whole route .
The average yeild on the 1st bfs/lhr ( when BA where here) was on average 79-87%
5415N
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 52N 20E
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ah! I'm sure Uncle Jim will be able to accomodate all those Biz pax on our Q400s.
That's if they can endure a 1hr 15 mim Bone Crunching sector or two.
It's the way forward you know.
The future's Gloomy. The future's Q400 shaped.......................
That's if they can endure a 1hr 15 mim Bone Crunching sector or two.
It's the way forward you know.
The future's Gloomy. The future's Q400 shaped.......................
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: belfast
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Obviously BMI are not alone judging by press releases from both Easyjet & Ryanair this week - both are reporting increased passenger nos and increasing pressure on yields - does this mean they are going to start ditching any routes where yields fall short of forecasts? If so, that would mean a subtantial number of routes could disappear simply because they are not performing as well as expected.
Surely it is possible to revise forecasts which might have been too optimistic to begin with!
Surely it is possible to revise forecasts which might have been too optimistic to begin with!