Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > African Aviation
Reload this Page >

Cape Town SAA A346

Wikiposts
Search
African Aviation Regional issues that affect the numerous pilots who work in this area of the world.

Cape Town SAA A346

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Nov 2007, 18:41
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: ..
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Found these on the web.







grant_737 is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2007, 19:26
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: South Africa
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just don't say where you got those pics Grant. Mention of THAT site gets you banned here.
nugpot is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2007, 22:30
  #43 (permalink)  
AlwaysOnFire
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: **** you PPRUNE!
Age: 24
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://allafrica.com/stories/200711030082.html
The accident happened 2:40 PM.
alexmcfire is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2007, 13:14
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Behind 1480mm RHA equivalent
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Judge not lest ye be judged yourself....

Having said that, I know what would have happened to me, had I done something like this whilst working for my present boss. I'm quite sure I'd have been fired pretty quickly. All this, whilst earning minimum wage too!

Yeah, sure, an A346 is a challenge to operate. THATS WHY THOSE BOYS AND GIRLS EARN THE BIG BUCKS. You don't seriously think you can just come to work and collect money for showing up, having earned enough seniority to get high enough in the queue to pole one of those? Nope, they have to deliver. And in this case, they didn't. You can cry ACSA, taxi lines, whatever (all are no doubt contributing factors, sure). But at the end of the day, this incident occured at taxi speed, in day, VMC, on a dry runway. In other words, the crew had the choice of continuing or not - and if they couldn't stop, then they were going too fast for the situation.

What I say here, I would expect to be said of me had I done the same thing. As pilots, we are held to a high standard, and that's how it is. Barring mechanical failure of some kind, they drove themselves into this mess, nobody else. It serves as a reminder of the constant vigilance required from all of us. Operating in Africa just makes the requirements all the higher.

Again, I merely mention how I would expect to be judged after doing what has apparently happened here.
Shrike200 is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2007, 23:56
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Asia
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If these taxiways was NOTAM’ed then I think ACSA’s lawyers will had a easy way out of this one. As we all know the P.I.C. carry the can. Rightly or wrongly so. If you have ever dealt with insurance / lawyers they will ask lots of questions and the only answers you can give is yes or no.
Beta Light is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2007, 01:19
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: up here, everyone looks like ants!
Posts: 966
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This just in: Capt's new nickname...

"SANDY"
Cpt. Underpants is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2007, 07:45
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In the hold
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was the same era as Capt. "SANDY". I got rejected as I was not the "right profile" ( still don't know why they interviewed me as my skin colour and sex is obvious ). She got hired.
I taxi my company's B777-300's around the world in a safe manner, even in Mumbai, doing 180's on the short runway when RWY27 is closed for maintenance. At night and rainy, Very, very tight even in dry daylight..

One of my era applicants just returned a B737 that lost an engine, yip, fell of, safely to the airport in bad weather.
Maybe S.A.A. reap what they sowed.
O.K. Fluffy Fan, Beech bum and Jett Nut, shoot.....
ByAirMail is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2007, 10:59
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Your nearest Marriott
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lemme help ByAirMail

Perhaps when you have an endless supply of bucks (yes you know from where) for maintenance, you dont need to rely too much on crew skills anymore.
I.R.PIRATE is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2007, 11:40
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Holding somewhere.....
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
O.K. Fluffy Fan, Beech bum and Jett Nut, shoot
And the reason for that???????
beechbum is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2007, 12:00
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Here and There
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have been curios as to why the nose wheel is so far off the tarmac and gave it some thought. Let me state ahead of time that I am not trying to be a smart ass and point fingers at anyone. I know that the whole thing could be a mechanical fault/computer malfunction and I will read the eventual report with much interest to discover the truth. I have flown the type and have seen the steering "do its own thing" on one occasion. I have also flown with other people that have had the same problem. This was a known problem at my company and I believe that the problem was sorted out.

I was thinking that had I been sitting in that unfortunate seat, the first thing that would probably happen as the nose slipped off the tar would be to increase the steering angle to get the machine back on the tar ASAP (It's human instinct to try and correct the problem first rather than stop and accept the mistake). With the nose at 70/80 degrees and very little/no grip on the dirt my guess is that the a/c continued in a straight line with the nose wheel turned until it dug itself in (or the brakes where applied).

I honestly hope for the crews sake that it was a problem with the aircraft but at the end of the day nobody was hurt and that's what really matters.

W2
whodunnit2 is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2007, 20:53
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: everywhere
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Warlock 2000.

The one doing the taxiing doesn't have nuts. Maybe a kick in the ps

Apparently the full nickname is Sandy Tyson.
Oom Kaspaas is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2007, 22:55
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Here
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oom Kaspaas

That was not very nice, this Captain of the flight are geting all the flack from everywhere. So stop all the crap till the investigation is over please.
sbh684b is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2007, 05:15
  #53 (permalink)  
Feasant Plucker
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In the lair of the Penguin......
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The one doing the taxiing doesn't have nuts. Maybe a kick in the ps
Spoken like the true "gentleman" you obviously are.

Your post shows a great deal of sensitivity. Obviously a lot of thought went into it.

One would hope you do not land up in the same situation yourself. Remember, "to err is human, to forgive, divine" and I'm sure you would like the same treatment some day............

An accident/incident is very seldom due to one action - normally a chain of events. Wait for the results of the investigation,
madherb is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2007, 05:44
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: south africa
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not surprised at all that the nosewheel came to a rest so far off the pavement. The -600 needs a lot of angular momentum at the start of the turn as it loses energy very quickly due to the pivoting stresses on the main landing gear. Particularly the inboard and center gear. Remember they are double bogeys and the mainwheels are turning very slowly while the nosewheel is arcing around at a fair rate. If you don't start the turn with sufficient momentum and thrust the aircraft will stop midturn, requiring a large application of asymetric thrust to get her going again.
In this case the angular momentum looked fine - but the judgement of when to start the turn was obviously off. With the nosewheel 5 meters behind the pilots position and the mains 38 meters behind, the -600 can be a real bitch to taxi around tight corners. Very easy to misjudge particularly if you are new on type. Having to do 150 degree turns is also very rare.
Everyone makes mistakes - but unlike most other profesions, our shortcomings are very visible and very public.
Hard luck guys.
congoman is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2007, 06:42
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sun, water, and lots of sand
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Congoman

What do you know about big Airbuses?
Just pulling your leg!

This is not an easy aeroplane to taxi around most airports. I notice now that we get more freedom at Heathrow from other aircraft when we start to taxi. We need the space and mustn't stop. The over steering is incredible and then you only just make the turn.

I find Delhi is also a catch with this aircraft, as the parking stripe is very short, so once you turn into the bay, there no forward distance to straighten up. Therefore the turn has to be correct 100%, when you decide to enter the bay. The camera's are great, but they don't help you when you make a sharp turn into the unknown, as you will loose your yellow stripe, as it is out of the field of vision of the camera.

To taxi this long machine well, takes time and experience I am still learning about it's dimensions each day I fly her.

Last edited by sidestick driver; 9th Nov 2007 at 06:53.
sidestick driver is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2007, 07:16
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In front of the PC
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With the nosewheel 5 meters behind the pilots position and the mains 38 meters behind, the -600 can be a real bitch to taxi around tight corners
Thats why you have a camera!

If you don't start the turn with sufficient momentum and thrust the aircraft will stop midturn, requiring a large application of asymetric thrust to get her going agai
Would have thought that since it was a short sector, the plane would be light and therefore would be wanting to run away with itself due excess power, (never thought I would say that about an Airbus). It would have meant taxying with feet on the brakes and an easy stop when you saw the lip of the tarmac approaching IN THE CAMERA!!!

Lets see what the investigation brings out
asianeagle is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2007, 07:21
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: south africa
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Asianeagle
Refer to SideStick Driver's observation about the camera's field of veiw when taking a tight turn.
congoman is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2007, 07:30
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In front of the PC
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes you are quite right the view is limited, but you have several fields of view, Nosewheel camera, Tail cam, windscreen and two pairs of eyes. You would surely have seen it coming.
asianeagle is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2007, 07:42
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: south africa
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well if they had - it wouldn't have happened then, would it?
Unlikely they did it on purpose!
More likely just an unfortunate error.
congoman is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2007, 07:46
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: MEL
Age: 55
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is a 150 degree turn on a non-existant taxi line with an aircraft known as one difficult to taxi.

Give them a break!
777Contrail is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.