Wikiposts
Search
African Aviation Regional issues that affect the numerous pilots who work in this area of the world.

B747-400 Combi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Sep 2006, 10:55
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: RSA
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B747-400 Combi

I'm helping in a "hunt" for 1 or 2 x B747-400 combi aircraft. They need the range and cargo capacity. Total pax load in the range of 170 - 200 would be fine.

Any ideas
ERASER is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2006, 00:37
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What routing are they looking at?

Curious to find out if this is one in the same of another inquiry on another site.

Cheers!

M.
c3000 is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2006, 05:27
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: RSA
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you are referring to the tread on “Rumours & News” about the “New 747-400 Operator info?” then unfortunately, it’s not the same airline.

This airline (not CIVAIR) would like to start local (SA) operations as soon as possible but the routes they intend to serve requires the range of a B747-400. They prefer the B747-400 Combi due to the additional cargo capacity on the main deck, ideal for the contracts already lined up. They tried to purchase/lease a B747 SP and/or B747 300 as an interim measure but the deal collapsed as soon as a certain carrier found out this will mean competition.

The intended route will include South, North America, the Far East and Africa.

E
ERASER is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2006, 05:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Planet Tharg
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't ZS reg aircraft have a moratorium on combi configuration after the Helderberg accident?

Last edited by Solid Rust Twotter; 21st Sep 2006 at 08:48.
Solid Rust Twotter is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2006, 08:34
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: RSA
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, I think there was something like that but I'm sure they will be able to lift that moratorium.

With the CAA today, no problem
ERASER is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2006, 08:45
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: world
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which African country is that concern of ?
navtrack is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2006, 09:02
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: RSA
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New "start up" out of RSA !
ERASER is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2006, 09:04
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: RSA
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not officially involved with this airline but I'm supporting their venture because of the opportunities to be created all around.

E
ERASER is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2006, 11:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good luck with the Combi mate- KLM operate one into JNB- they are loosing millions on the route. Don’t forget the pax as the cargo side is VERY one directional and hyper competitive- most of the bigger all Cargo operators come in here already- Martinair just increased its capacity by 2 frequencies per week.
Deskjocky is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2006, 12:11
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: RSA
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you for the heads up will pass it on. Don’t want to rat on their business plans but they will be flying into major cities not currently served, including lucrative cargo contracts as back bone for the freight portion.

I really hope it works for them, I have my doubts but I will support them as far as possible. The rumour of the "start up" has some major players uneasy

E
ERASER is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2006, 12:40
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: RSA
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eraser this airline you speaking of wouldn't
by any chance be Cantaun now would it?
putt for dough is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2006, 12:46
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: RSA
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All I have to say..........
ERASER is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2006, 12:51
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: RSA
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fair enough
putt for dough is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2006, 13:09
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: RSA
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It would not be fair of me, not being an official representative, to give too much detail and information away! I’m just supporting a SA company, maybe along the way they create a couple of job opportunities for “our” people and giving a certain carrier hell.

I have seen Impala, Avia, USAfrica and the likes go down but I will forever support new SA companies against the “big boys”

Please don't stop looking for the B747-400 Combi's and passing on the information.

Thank you!!

E
ERASER is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2006, 14:05
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I’m just supporting a SA company, maybe along the way they create a couple of job opportunities for “our” people and giving a certain carrier hell.
Good on you mate- just remember what has happened to every one airplane longhaul airline launched, guys get hired- leave viable jobs and wind up with nothing....

With a 744 combi the only thing going to hell is the owners bank balance
Deskjocky is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2006, 14:53
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: RSA
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hope it finally gets off the ground!

The more the merrier
putt for dough is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 06:07
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: RSA
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to my understanding the B747-400 Combi would be the only jet, capable of uplifting the contract cargo and passengers over the distance required. I’m by no means an expert on this but I’m sure they investigate all available options. It seems that I might have received some info on B747-400 Combi’s available for charter, will keep you informed.


Thank you

E
ERASER is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 13:03
  #18 (permalink)  
Gatvol
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: KLAS/TIST/FAJS/KFAI
Posts: 4,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sort of interesting as to what gets hauled around and what makes money. I had a friend at one of the big Cargo outfits lay out the math one day and it seems that Passengers beyond being a pain in the ass, a liability and just generally looking for a free ride, are not always the best things to pay for an aircraft.
Take a look at the folks at FedEx, DHL, UPS etc. I dont know, but I can only assume that they are making pretty good coins. If you figure what one pays for an average envelope and take about 180 pounds of those you can see that they certainly get more money per volume than puking passengers with complaint forms in each hand.
Passengers have to travel, but based on what I have seen if I was an investor, I would look for big Cargo contracts.
Sombody clue me in..........
B Sousa is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 14:09
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Backabeyond
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BSousa, too true. To make the big money these days, one certaily has to look at the major freight operators. According to the Pro Pilot Salary Study for 2006, it is the UPS and Fedex boys that are earning the biggest bucks.

For comparison:

United Max Capt on largest $15028 pm
US Airways Max Capt on largest type $13215 pm
Northwest Max Capt on largest type $13075 pm
Fedex Max Capt on largest type $17943 pm
UPS Max Capt on largest type $17290 pm
Interesting to see that a LCC, Southwest Max Capt is $16175.

Apparently 737s obtained at a reasonable price and well managed can still make enough money to return good salaries.
Yossarian is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2006, 14:31
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes quite true- assuming you can make a return both ways- this market is veeeeery one directional- so effectively you make half the bucks. I know of at least one all cargo carrier that refuses to up load any cargo out of JNB (about all they take is a pallet stack)- instead they route EMPTY to another African country where they are able to uplift a load that offers an economical return. Just shows you the value of a full load.

I really need to say something here- simply to ward off potential employees to this type of fly by nighter- and believe me they will be. A 744 combi would be the absolutely WORST choice in aircraft imaginable. Southbound you may be ok- cell phones, car parts PC’s etc, but is you have a look at the majority of cargo shipped north/east/west whatever -its fresh produce. Now you want to load up 15 tons of fresh fish on the upper deck? You are really going to have to have a cool reception for your pax! Most of our exports fall into this category the list goes on..flowers etc etc.

Now I know some beanie is going to chirp up- we will put the pax bags up there- how much is that- 3 tons? return catering maybe another ton? What about the rest of the space??

The numbers just don’t add up- choose what you want to be all cargo- good idea- just don’t base yourself in South Africa, all pax- maybe not so good but you may find a nice down here in which to operate. Try and be a jack of all trades- I give it 2 rotations and it’s a goner.
Deskjocky is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.