Qatar Airways Cargo 777 damages its right wing
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Paradise
Age: 60
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Qatar Airways Cargo 777 damages its right wing
=AZWwfpHPvayJdn36O4jvBe1a9OBovBCk77WUOf04cCJ8dkKoL1Rg1GBAbtO 31KUmDv_UOnXZ7TW6XYd3QSaNdUeolc4fhPzsdr25VMU_TWjpIwGLYqt_fRU aA6y7NdvIm8MnkizWLkC_NVLWDZjXjhYlwNssmWFGUCYkQzWwg0HbBYq7MhL T9HKopvwgseOqmrxju-2WIU5VkV0qOFTZBzPn&__tn__=*NK-y-R]Qatar Airways Cargo 777 damages it's right wing after hitting a lamp post while taxiing at Chicago O'Hare Airport. No injuries reported.


Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Wan Chai
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They are on BB2. Must have missed the turn down to U and thought they could skip straight onto Z. They have ended up in the Regional Jet parking apron with a taxiway wingspan max of 36m. Tad shy of the 65m needed to get down there.
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Europe
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well they just followed ATC instruction perfectly
Qatar cargo ooops at Chicago
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Wan Chai
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The is the expat risk. With 2 sets of crew onboard all in the cockpit then all are liable for anything that goes wrong. In this case a taxiing down a Max 36 wingspan taxiway should have been picked up by someone... Clearly it wasn't.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: My views - Not my employer!
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looking at Google Earth, the taxiway doesn't seem to have any paintwork listing the wingspan limits - These seem to appear (very usefully!) in some places (for an example you could check EHAM ramp here). Simple, cheap, effective...
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: .
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looking at Google Earth, the taxiway doesn't seem to have any paintwork listing the wingspan limits - These seem to appear (very usefully!) in some places (for an example you could check EHAM ramp here). Simple, cheap, effective...
Join Date: May 2010
Location: EARTH
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
were only two in the cockpit. Atlanta Chicago is not a long flight. I don't know if was any dead heading crew. Even if was any why to fire them. It's not reasonable. I am not sure the article is correct
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: in the world
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Clemente, CA
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
QR Fires All 4 Pilots!

ORD is a jungle, even for this former United pilot!
l have a bad feeling these poor bastards flew all the way from Doha to Atlanta and then Chicago?
Talking about being so fatigued, you turn into a taxiway not authorized for your aircraft and perhaps with some help from a sleepy Ground Controller you find that damn light pole that jumps in front of you out of nowhere and wrap your wing around it!
l have no idea what happened nor l want blame anyone without knowing al the facts. But for QR to fire these guys on the spot, without any investigation is petty shitty, l think.
l trained a couple of QR 777 crews when they first got them and a little familiar with their “off with their heads” culture. Those of you on Linkdin may want to have some fun finding my post about this, and the beatings l received from non pilots and obviously QR shills for suggesting fatigue may have been a part in this unfortunate incident.
lf you’ve never fallen asleep inside the Marker, hand flying a 707, don’t bother! 😎
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: N/A
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts