Unintentional Flight Into IMC.
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
There was nothing "quick" about that little fiasco. That went wrong when either clown A or clown B decided to ignore: the NZ AIP, basic airmanship and meteorology for Dummies.
Very lucky to walk away from that, and scud running up a Cumulus bank is not "Clear of Cloud in sight of the surface"
The title of this thread should be corrected to Intentional flight into IMC......
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes
on
222 Posts
That was my own thought. There was an early option to turn right, away from the cloud and from the high ground.
Feet seemed glued to the floor,slip-string all over the canopy......
Moderator
Well two pilots made a remarkable poor decision!
Yes, I think I heard the word "spin" in there somewhere, hardly surprising! I can't see any mitigating factor to excuse entering the cloud as they did....
But, I credit them with posting the video, that others might learn.....
Feet seemed glued to the floor,slip-string all over the canopy.....
But, I credit them with posting the video, that others might learn.....
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes
on
222 Posts
From reading the comments under the video it appears that posting it in public was actually more unintentional than the IMC!
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: LHBS
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
According to a video review of the incident, the most important mistake was to fly above the cloud layer, assuming that the positive vario they experienced on the windward side will remain. What probably happened - according to the reviewing glider instructor - was that as soon as they flew above the cloud layer on top of the ridge line, they lost situational awareness, got drifted over the ridgeline into the sinking air, and got sucked into the cloud layer. They weren't expecting this and tried to descend out at the bottom, resulting in a dive in the cloud and at least an 8 G pull-up when they saw the ground. There was no spin, it was more like a warning that they they might spin, if they continue to climb back into the cloud.
That useful video is removed now, possibly in an attempt to widthdraw the original one from public view.
That useful video is removed now, possibly in an attempt to widthdraw the original one from public view.
Scary to look at. That's called instruction? Not many instruments for basic IMC flying are installed inside that cockpit.
Glad they survived it. Sharing it will help many others.
Glad they survived it. Sharing it will help many others.
GLIDING UK
It was relatively standard to have a turn and slip in UK gliders.
Cloud climbs not uncommon with a specific frequency to avoid collisions.
Climbed in cloud triggered by a coal fired power station with 5 others in an divergently unstable glider..not a problem bar the mental stress.
The video appears to illustrate what happens with wave flying whether the system is set up from terrain or wind shear.
Unfortunately the behaviour of the atmosphere isn’t predictable which caught these guys out...reminded me of what happened to the AirFrance guys penetrating the ITCZ.
Like many I have been caught out but remember gliding records are incredible..endurance 57 hours, altitude 60,000? and distance over 3,000 km. It’s what happens as do the accidents flying in the french alps.
It was relatively standard to have a turn and slip in UK gliders.
Cloud climbs not uncommon with a specific frequency to avoid collisions.
Climbed in cloud triggered by a coal fired power station with 5 others in an divergently unstable glider..not a problem bar the mental stress.
The video appears to illustrate what happens with wave flying whether the system is set up from terrain or wind shear.
Unfortunately the behaviour of the atmosphere isn’t predictable which caught these guys out...reminded me of what happened to the AirFrance guys penetrating the ITCZ.
Like many I have been caught out but remember gliding records are incredible..endurance 57 hours, altitude 60,000? and distance over 3,000 km. It’s what happens as do the accidents flying in the french alps.
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes
on
222 Posts
Cloud flying in good lift over a power station is one thing but I’ve never yet seen a coal fired power station sitting in the hills.
That is an utterly terrifying video to watch.
The initial flight into IMC is bad enough, but the footage of the trees and hillside - man, that could so easily have been the last thing they ever saw.
The initial flight into IMC is bad enough, but the footage of the trees and hillside - man, that could so easily have been the last thing they ever saw.
Two thoughts/questions - Was the altimeter set to QFE or QNH and, when faced with the cloud bank what prompted the turn to the left ('the valley') rather than the clear air to the right?
... a supplementary - Would pilots in a particularly mountainous country not have a grounding in the peculiarities of mountain flying and associated Wx effects?
... a supplementary - Would pilots in a particularly mountainous country not have a grounding in the peculiarities of mountain flying and associated Wx effects?
Cornish Jack
Basically NO.
I've been flying in mountains for 25 years after doing a unique weeks course with Jaques Noel who was the top professional mountain flying instructor. Part of every day was pointing out crash sites and how they got it wrong.
I am still learning about weather, orographic cloud, rotor and valley winds in spite of learning how to forecast 50 years ago and similar period observing from land, sea and air.
Altimeters are set to QNH for airspace and transiting goals between mountains. Displacement is purely on eyeball. Got caught out once as thought I was further away judging by the height of the fir trees until I could see the blades of grass having assumed that the trees were 60ft..in the upper slopes they are much shorter. The biggest danger in the french alps are wires followed by collision and lastly flying over colls where the air mass might be totally different and form a wall of cloud.
High G is used in gliders to avoid exceeding vne and flutter..used it once when low level aerobatics went wrong.
They are built far stronger than conventional aircraft..my first was tested to 12G.
I've been flying in mountains for 25 years after doing a unique weeks course with Jaques Noel who was the top professional mountain flying instructor. Part of every day was pointing out crash sites and how they got it wrong.
I am still learning about weather, orographic cloud, rotor and valley winds in spite of learning how to forecast 50 years ago and similar period observing from land, sea and air.
Altimeters are set to QNH for airspace and transiting goals between mountains. Displacement is purely on eyeball. Got caught out once as thought I was further away judging by the height of the fir trees until I could see the blades of grass having assumed that the trees were 60ft..in the upper slopes they are much shorter. The biggest danger in the french alps are wires followed by collision and lastly flying over colls where the air mass might be totally different and form a wall of cloud.
High G is used in gliders to avoid exceeding vne and flutter..used it once when low level aerobatics went wrong.
They are built far stronger than conventional aircraft..my first was tested to 12G.
What he said ^^^
Having watched the video a few times, there’s nothing wrong with the skirting of the cloud initially, as they have a clear route out into a valley. One does wonder why they didn’t do some tacks in the lift to get above the cloud layer but I suppose that would have made it too easy.
When they turn left, it sets them up for a bad outcome, but they still had the ability to do a hard right and exit for quite a while. What I find incredible is that there don't appear to be any blind flying instruments in the front and judging by the unusual attitudes, in the rear as well. Even if they were in neutral air, it appears they would have gone into cloud, which leaves a huge ??? hanging over the whole thing. From the comments on the official NZ gliding site, it seem like one of those distracted instructor, unsure student scenarios where no-one really has projected the flight path forward.
If you’re going to flirt with cloud, you need a plan to get out of it, should the worst happen. Having some kind of reference is crucial as you will disorient pretty quickly, especially in turbulence. There are also occasions where, despite the best of planning, the weather changes and you have to do a cloud descent. If you don’t have any instruments, you can do it on GPS (or even a compass) but that requires a bit of skill and mental discipline. Better to have a phone app for emergencies - I use iBFD in case of a double failure in my panel.
Having watched the video a few times, there’s nothing wrong with the skirting of the cloud initially, as they have a clear route out into a valley. One does wonder why they didn’t do some tacks in the lift to get above the cloud layer but I suppose that would have made it too easy.
When they turn left, it sets them up for a bad outcome, but they still had the ability to do a hard right and exit for quite a while. What I find incredible is that there don't appear to be any blind flying instruments in the front and judging by the unusual attitudes, in the rear as well. Even if they were in neutral air, it appears they would have gone into cloud, which leaves a huge ??? hanging over the whole thing. From the comments on the official NZ gliding site, it seem like one of those distracted instructor, unsure student scenarios where no-one really has projected the flight path forward.
If you’re going to flirt with cloud, you need a plan to get out of it, should the worst happen. Having some kind of reference is crucial as you will disorient pretty quickly, especially in turbulence. There are also occasions where, despite the best of planning, the weather changes and you have to do a cloud descent. If you don’t have any instruments, you can do it on GPS (or even a compass) but that requires a bit of skill and mental discipline. Better to have a phone app for emergencies - I use iBFD in case of a double failure in my panel.
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Near Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Hello!
That's better than nothing, but don't forget that this is not a real artificial horizon. The effects of turbulence and prolonged turns will make it unreliable in less than a minute. It can help to maintain level flight for a very short while but not more than that. The solid state accelerometers built into smartphones are just that: accelerometers. Not real gyroscopes. And it needs to be turned on and "calibrated", i.e. aligned with the horizon, before it can be used.
Not true for iPhones - they have all that’s necessary to create a full strapdown INS. I’ve had iBFD running for a whole flight including aeros and IMC and it was exactly in sync with my EFIS. That particular app I think was written by someone who writes software for instruments for a living and uses the gyros, accelerometers and GPS. If you don’t believe me, download it and try it - not expensive at £12. It’s not certified in any way but it’s better than a blank screen inside to go with the one outside!
I’m not suggesting for a minute that you should strap it to your yoke and take off in OVC000 and 75m but as something that is there for use in an emergency it could save your life...
I’m not suggesting for a minute that you should strap it to your yoke and take off in OVC000 and 75m but as something that is there for use in an emergency it could save your life...
The part I found profoundly sad was the “just another day in a glider” low key and low energy conversation in the cockpit. Where this video starts was in an area where great care needs to be taken. Not dangerous per se but there should have been a steady dialogue about how the situation was developing and where the out was as well as some definite “no go” criteria spoken out loud.
The huge one is never fly over a solid deck that is just below you and never ever ever be in a situation where up air is required to stay on top. This goes triple when flying over a ridge. Ridge cloud can develop and/or move very quickly with a change in wind and.has to be respected, as well as the absolute requirement to maintain positional awareness so that you don’t inadvertently cross over to the lee side and get into sink.
Frankly I wonder about the safety culture of this glider club. I find it hard to believe that given the relaxed atmosphere in the glider, that guys where not frequently pushing the ridge lift around and over clouds.
Google “Normalization of Deviance”
The huge one is never fly over a solid deck that is just below you and never ever ever be in a situation where up air is required to stay on top. This goes triple when flying over a ridge. Ridge cloud can develop and/or move very quickly with a change in wind and.has to be respected, as well as the absolute requirement to maintain positional awareness so that you don’t inadvertently cross over to the lee side and get into sink.
Frankly I wonder about the safety culture of this glider club. I find it hard to believe that given the relaxed atmosphere in the glider, that guys where not frequently pushing the ridge lift around and over clouds.
Google “Normalization of Deviance”