Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Accidents and Close Calls
Reload this Page >

Cardiff City Footballer Feared Missing after aircraft disappeared near Channel Island

Accidents and Close Calls Discussion on accidents, close calls, and other unplanned aviation events, so we can learn from them, and be better pilots ourselves.

Cardiff City Footballer Feared Missing after aircraft disappeared near Channel Island

Old 24th Jan 2019, 09:35
  #281 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Farnborough
Posts: 62
On the possibility that the aircraft was heavy with a reasonable amount of luggage, presumably the handlers in charge that evening at Aviapartner Executive (assuming that's the agent/handler/FBO used) will recall how much stuff they carried over to the aircraft. Likewise they might enlighten the AAIB on other pertinant facts - the rumoured attempt to start-up several times etc.
Romaro is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2019, 09:40
  #282 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 513
Mr Mckay added that the plane was "not owned in any way or part by either myself or any member of my family".

He said he began looking into arranging a private flight to take him to Nantes after his medical and signing in Cardiff on Saturday, at the footballer's request.

The question for Mr McKay
1) Who did he call to ďarrangeĒ the flight and did he borrow the aircraft from a friend or was this a commercial transaction?

The questions for Fay Keely
1) Are you the owner of the aircraft?
2) If so, who did you rent it to?
3) Did you provide the pilot?
4) If not, did you ask what the aircraft was to be used for and check the qualifications of the pilot?
runway30 is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2019, 09:43
  #283 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: PommyLand - but I'll be back!
Posts: 170
Many thanks for the clarification ChickenHouse. I still donít fully understand though why people donít appear on the database. Obviously those who have never held an FAA licence will not appear but for example, I myself had an FAA Airman Certificate, admittedly rather a long time ago, issued on the basis of a CAA licence and I have no entry in the database. Others whom I know did their initial licence in the US are not there; I have searched even for one who I know did his ATPL in the States and there is no entry. It could of course, (most likely!), be that I am just using the search function wrong.

GWYN is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2019, 09:51
  #284 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BRISTOL
Posts: 7
Originally Posted by Icaruss View Post

What engine might have been fitted which would change the issues?
Two non reciprocating ones.
sheldon6 is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2019, 09:54
  #285 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: London
Posts: 148
Originally Posted by Icaruss View Post
I may be being obtuse but why would we not trust the FAA database that says Continental TSIO 520? Is there any reason to suspect an unrecorded change to a different engine? What engine might have been fitted which would change the issues?
If you look up N921GG, another PA46, it is still showing a piston Lyco TIO-540-AE2A, whereas I know for a fact that it had undergone a JetProp conversion to a turboprop. It is now powered by a Pratt & Whitney PT6A, FAA doesn't seem to update the engine information.

After reading conflicting information in press reports ("Piper Malibu" with a "single turbine engine") I have checked on the JetProp webpage listing all past JetProp conversions and haven't found the accident aircraft registration there. Having said that, a few conversions on their list have the aircraft identification redacted. Having said that in turn, had it been converted to a turboprop, we would have probably seen by now a photo showing the accident aircraft with a changed look. On conversion the engine cowling length increases dramatically, to accommodate for the turbine PT6A engine length.

hegemon88 is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2019, 09:57
  #286 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Farnborough
Posts: 62
Where is this aircraft's normal home base? Nobody in this entire thread seems to have clarified that? Is it Gamston? Identified owner (Cool Flourish / Fay Keely?) had another aircraft at Gamston?
Romaro is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2019, 09:57
  #287 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: The World
Posts: 1,220
Originally Posted by GWYN View Post
Many thanks for the clarification ChickenHouse. I still donít fully understand though why people donít appear on the database. Obviously those who have never held an FAA licence will not appear but for example, I myself had an FAA Airman Certificate, admittedly rather a long time ago, issued on the basis of a CAA licence and I have no entry in the database. Others whom I know did their initial licence in the US are not there; I have searched even for one who I know did his ATPL in the States and there is no entry. It could of course, (most likely!), be that I am just using the search function wrong.
I added it to the post above. If you did not give permission to publish the data, there will be no entry in the public database. When you did your validation before the IACRA portal and never got into it again, they will have no permit to publish and respect that.
ChickenHouse is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2019, 10:04
  #288 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 513
Originally Posted by Romaro View Post
Where is this aircraft's normal home base? Nobody in this entire thread seems to have clarified that? Is it Gamston? Identified owner (Cool Flourish / Fay Keely?) had another aircraft at Gamston?
https://goo.gl/images/Yv3Qgp
runway30 is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2019, 10:05
  #289 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: The World
Posts: 1,220
Originally Posted by hegemon88 View Post
If you look up N921GG, another PA46, it is still showing a piston Lyco TIO-540-AE2A, whereas I know for a fact that it had undergone a JetProp conversion to a turboprop. It is now powered by a Pratt & Whitney PT6A, FAA doesn't seem to update the engine information.

After reading conflicting information in press reports ("Piper Malibu" with a "single turbine engine") I have checked on the JetProp webpage listing all past JetProp conversions and haven't found the accident aircraft registration there. Having said that, a few conversions on their list have the aircraft identification redacted. Having said that in turn, had it been converted to a turboprop, we would have probably seen by now a photo showing the accident aircraft with a changed look. On conversion the engine cowling length increases dramatically, to accommodate for the turbine PT6A engine length.
From all we know and all pictures on the net, some are quite recent, there appears to be no turbine conversion for the aircraft in question.
Doing a conversion and not following the obligation to update the registry is rather a bad indication for the shop putting a PT6 in a PA46 ...
Btw, the increase in cowling length is more due to weight & balance as the turbine is much lighter than the reciprocating engine.
ChickenHouse is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2019, 10:19
  #290 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: London
Posts: 148
Originally Posted by ChickenHouse View Post
From all we know and all pictures on the net, some are quite recent, there appears to be no turbine conversion for the aircraft in question.
Fair enough, that's what I thought.
Originally Posted by ChickenHouse View Post
Doing a conversion and not following the obligation to update the registry is rather a bad indication for the shop putting a PT6 in a PA46 ...
Not my aircraft - it was just to illustrate the engine conversion might have been carried out without the FAA database showing it.
Originally Posted by ChickenHouse View Post
Btw, the increase in cowling length is more due to weight & balance as the turbine is much lighter than the reciprocating engine.
OK, I thought it was a combination of reasons - length and W&B; I do remember the conversion "creates" an additional cargo compartment behind the engine to increase the engine's arm in the W&B situation.
hegemon88 is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2019, 10:22
  #291 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 748
Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post
Ņ Which "police" ?

Welsh?
French?
Channel Islands; which one(s) ?
Monaqesque?


Second thoughts:

US?
Which state?
Guernsey. They used to fly a "Donkey" copper to Alderney for a couple of hours once a week IIRC
Clare Prop is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2019, 10:32
  #292 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 255
I agree that Icarrus's post at #248 is one of the best summaries. My thoughts are that it is unlikely to be engine failure as there was no distress call. It would seem most likely to be a loss of control for one of the following reasons:

1) Ice contamination on control surfaces.
2) Ice affecting pitot static system resulting in inaccurate airspeed and altitude indications, essential in IMC and could lead to disorientation.
3) A loss of primary AI gyro, vacuum pump failure etc could result in immediate upset.
4) Pilot incapacitation. The passenger would not have a hope.

The Malibu is quite a hot ship. I have no doubt reliance would have been put on the autopilot for night IMC flying. The first three possibilities above could all result in the autopilot either disconnecting or deviating from its intended path. This would need prompt manual intervention with instrument rating skills to avoid rapid loss of control. The JFK junior PA-32 accident at Martha's Vineyard is a good example of disorientation and loss of control. I doubt we will ever know the real cause of this tragic accident as the plane will probably never be found.
suninmyeyes is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2019, 10:35
  #293 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Guernsey
Posts: 4
If they had to ditch they were stuffed.
Weather was solid force 6 from the SW at the Channel Light Vessel at the time, varying between 23&30knots if I remember correctly. Dull and overcast/cloudy in Guernsey during the afternoon. Later in the evening (10pm?) I noticed the weather deteriorate as a front came through (gusty, sleet/hail/rain). Sea state at the CLV was 2m waves every 6-7 seconds - a very heavy 'chop' as opposed to a swell. Would have been classed as 'rather rough or rough' I suspect. It's 'spring tides' with a decent run of current in the area.
When CIAS first started searching at 9pm they had over 10 miles visibility, although I don't know what the cloud base was. It got worse and they had to give up as the cloudbase dropped too low. This is from pilots who regularly fly below clifftop height (100mASL).
Even if they managed to 'land' nicely on the water they'd have been swamped within a minute and almost certainly sunk. Alderney Lifeboat have some footage from yesterday's search on their facebook page when the weather was nicer than disappearance night. Proper horrible. I've fished up round that way a fair bit in nice weather, on that night it would have been apocalyptic to be bobbing around in the sea. If by some freak of luck they managed to get out alive and get to the Casquets or other reefs off Alderney they'd have been smashed up in the breakers trying to get out the water. I'm amazed at the amount of effort put into the search, had it been a fishing boat with two crew that disappeared they'd have given up by lunchtime the day after.
Toerag is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2019, 10:50
  #294 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Farnham, Surrey
Posts: 1,190
Originally Posted by Romaro View Post
On the possibility that the aircraft was heavy with a reasonable amount of luggage, presumably the handlers in charge that evening at Aviapartner Executive (assuming that's the agent/handler/FBO used) will recall how much stuff they carried over to the aircraft. Likewise they might enlighten the AAIB on other pertinant facts - the rumoured attempt to start-up several times etc.
It's a 6-seat aeroplane - how much luggage makes a 6-seat aeroplane overweight when only carrying two people?

​​​​​​​PDR
PDR1 is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2019, 11:01
  #295 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: ILS 110.75
Posts: 435
I see from the 2015 BBC Ferry Pilot video that features the accident aircraft N264DB, was fitted with what looks like an Artex ELT.

SARs have not indicated whether this was activated/ detected during the initial search.


Auxtank is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2019, 11:02
  #296 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 48
Originally Posted by PDR1 View Post
It's a 6-seat aeroplane - how much luggage makes a 6-seat aeroplane overweight when only carrying two people?

​​​​​​​PDR
He was en-route to a new home so may have feasibly been carrying quite an amount of possessions/weight - so also interested in the payload of that variant.
bakerpictures is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2019, 11:04
  #297 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hadlow
Age: 56
Posts: 587
Originally Posted by Strumble Head View Post
Am I alone in finding that details such as 'N'-registered aircraft being operated in UK and Europe with unsuspecting passengers on a PPL are bringing back unhappy memories of Graham Hill and his last flight?
AAIB Report on accident to Piper PA-23 N6645Y
Whilst the aircraft involved was displaying N6645Y, at the time of the accident it was being flown unregistered and stateless.
Super VC-10 is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2019, 11:06
  #298 (permalink)  

...the thin end thereof
 
Join Date: Jun 1998
Location: London
Posts: 269
Very sad story and once you cut through the inaccuracies it looks as though there is going to be some serious fall-out from this (presumed) accident on various fronts.

“you don’t understand you don’t have time to worry about facts we just have to write a story”.
Yes, of course you're right in everything you say Icaruss at #278 The media have always been very unpopular on this website. But those hacks are actually right in what they say. Journalists aren't interested in facts, they're interested in stories. They're under heavy pressure to get stories from their editor; and file them to very tight deadlines. Why? Because we, the people, are interested in reading them. That is their job. The Daily Star has some nonsense about a throwaway comment Sala's ex-girlfriend made about this being a 'mafia hit'. A lot of rubbish and it's a nice story for that small constituency of people who read the Daily Star over their greasy spoon breakfast. Journalists aren't pilots and they don't have that expert knowledge that pilots have, which is why it's interesting to read threads like this when something like this happens. (I'm not a pilot.)

We're all complicit in the rush to jump to conclusions and speculate; and rely on unverified information. Especially in the information age. It just means that the discerning observer has to spend a bit of time cutting through the rubbish. And let's be honest - pilots wouldn't really want the press to get every detail right every time would they? If they did there'd be nothing to rant on here about.

Anyway - I really hope they find some wreckage soon. Must be terrible for the families.
Wedge is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2019, 11:09
  #299 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,916
WWW
I do not doubt the letter you have received from a FSDO however I can find no basis for this opinion in US law.
Then I suggest you look at FAR61.3 a (1)
However; when the aircraft is operated within a foreign country, a current pilots licence issued by the country in which the aircraft is opertated may be used
So it is perfectly legal under US Law. FAR 61.75 which you quoted has nothing to do with it.

I would have expected anyone with any knowledge of operating N Reg outside the US would be familiar with this. The FSDO ruling was that "a current pilots licence valid in the foreign state" was covered under the existing law, even if it was not in accordance with ICAO Annex 1 i.e. IMC Ratings and NPPLs.

Last edited by Whopity; 24th Jan 2019 at 12:47.
Whopity is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2019, 12:09
  #300 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: a rock near 50 North
Posts: 109
Vac Pump

Question for those Malibu pilots on here, does the Vac Pump also inflate the boots on this aircraft ? I used to fly a Cessna twin with TSIO-520 engines where the Vac pumps did the instruments and boots. Thankfully twins have two Vac pumps, presumeably the Malibu only has one and its failure in IMC and icing conditions could spoil your day.
five zero by ortac is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.