RR is right, two sides to every story and he makes many good points, I'll just pick up on a couple.
but I suppose an iron clad section 106 legal agreement isn’t good enough for you?
No it isn't - one of the funniest things written on Prrune for many a year. Suggest you do a bit of research on how developers use S106.
Given that 24H DOs, increased fire category and terminal refurbishments are things that have happened or are happening and can be seen with your own eyes, I don’t know what better qualifies as backing up my argument [on this occasion]!!
You mention these repeatedly as evidence that Peel are moving forward - just as valid an interpretation is that these are steps to retain existing operators - lets face it, losing KLM would be hugely damaging (and no, I've no evidence for this but...)