Originally Posted by
Eddie Dean
It was actually the opposite, the new AOC holder wanted the Registered owner/ operators details reverted to MyJet. For obvious reasons. ....
"Opposite" of what?
The reasons ACJC doesn't want to appear as the registered operator after the accident are, as you say, obvious.
If you read the AAT's decision you will see that
before the accident ACJC was agitating CASA to find out why ACJC had not become the registered operator in accordance with an application submitted in December 2016. Indeed, ACJC's most recent inquiry to CASA was the day before the accident - 20 Feb.
On my reading of the AAT decision, the only reason the application had not been processed to completion in January in accordance the registration holder's wishes and ACJC's signed consent was that the registration holder's $65 credit card authorisation 'bounced'. The amount was then paid and the application actioned on 16 Feb. ACJC found out about this on .... 21 Feb.