No facts were presented - just observations.
Errrm, the fact is that you, Choccy Lab, said:
the fact is that it did NOT behave as it should have so I'd be looking at reasons why it DIDN'T not why it should have performed better.
Your words and emphatic capitalisation.
You also said:
Why is the pilot making Mayday calls a few seconds off the runway when he 'should have' been flying the aeroplane, getting it sorted and then making a PAN call?
Is it a fact that the pilot made mayday calls, plural? Read what VH-Cheer Up posted at #181.
You also said:
It [the propeller] wasn't feathered and was not developing power.
Your emphatic underlining.
What's the difference between assertions of fact and "observations" of what DID and DID NOT happen?