Vi giro un interessante articolo pubblicato dall'ottimo David Learmont su Flight International: "Licensed to fly but not up to the job"
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...mpeten-430769/
Lo rivolgo a 2positive ma credo che sia 'erga omnes'.
Un paio di perle:
Evidence from accidents and incidents over the past couple of decades is that poor decision-making by the crew has been a causal factor in most of them. Conversely, in situations where crews have successfully dealt with complex failures – such as the US Airways Airbus A320 Hudson River ditching after a multiple birdstrike took out both engines, and the successful recovery of Qantas A380 flight QF32 after a catastrophic uncontained engine failure – the success was due to high quality decision-making.
Owens says that knowledge obtained through a study of the experiences of others can contribute to this process. He gives the example of the DHL A300F crew near Baghdad who lost all hydraulics in a missile strike and made a successful landing using only engine power to control the aircraft. The DHL commander had read the experience of a United Airlines McDonnell Douglas DC-10 crew at Sioux City, Iowa, who controlled and landed their aircraft using throttles only following the loss of all hydraulics
Giuro che non sono stato io, un brontolone pterosauro, a suggerirli all'estensore.
Che ci sia lo zampino del P2f, oltre al 'Magenta line' etc.?
Romano