90% of said services lost for reasons concerning the client
So DTVA has just been unlucky with it's operators being unsuccessful? Doesn't that in itself tell its own story?
Maybe DTVA could only attract the marginal players. Isn't it telling that more robust operators didn't step in when these disappeared?
Look at this link - it's quite staggering the amount of IT traffic which has disappeared. Also, weren't RYR in DTVA before NCL? Wasn't the airport tax Peel's idea?
http://www.dtvmovements.co.uk/Archiv...3/2003-Jun.pdf