Originally Posted by
trent1974
You should have said that in the first place Callone because it makes you look foolish when you tell us the "good news" that nobody will have more than 85 hours next month. Unless my sked changes before publishing I will have approx. 91 hours. Better than 95 - 100 I guess. But, I am sure that the "no more than 15 days off in a month" restriction is still there. I couldn't seem to get one NA trip anytime in the month. Had they given me a couple of those with the hours reduced to 91 then I probably would have broken the 15 days off rule. Silly!
Of course some may say I'm jumping the gun since the roster is not published. I'll be sure to report back when it is.
Can you show me where I said good news? Because it makes you look foolish reading somethings and understanding something else.
I just said that in my perception attending the meeting was not a waste of time, is an easy concept also foolish should be able to understand.