You would think that the airport would dip its toe in the water and invest in at least a couple of airbridges, as it would make the airport a bit more desirable to some airlines.
I agree to a point, But we have all been having convos about how the airport is full and still growing without them "wasting" money on infrastructure they dont think they need. If they can get airlines without them and it saves them money not to build them it is an obvious outcome.
Like I said none that have left have fired any shots or complained about the airport.