PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Direct operating costs of a C172 or PA28?
Old 23rd May 2015, 07:41
  #18 (permalink)  
Aussie Bob
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: nosar
Posts: 1,289
Received 25 Likes on 13 Posts
The poor old 172 usually cops a bucketful for being uninteresting, uninspiring, a poor performer (ok, fair cop - when it's 42°C it won't pull the skin off a rice custard), dull to fly and the epitome of the Wichita spam can
Yep, but it's like the demure secretary with glasses, capable of all sorts of surprising things, and a great fun little number to play with. I feel sorry for the pilots that don't realise it.
Aussie Bob is offline