@appleACE
Thanks for the clarification!
However, my point is that with such a titled thread, there is obviously a problem for one poster, and then someone with an agenda adds their 'considered' thoughts, basically to try and make Contractair look even worse.
Well, it smacks a little of maybe another agency stirring the pot. There is no helpful fact here to aid PBY in his issue.
It would be somewhat like me adding that people should steer clear of Airline 'X' because they use pilots who are completely unsafe because they nearly didn't pass their type ratings, but did in the end. Or that the DFO is a really slippery sod who in a safety situation would throw his crew to the wolves, but then actually didn't.
Basically, it adds exactly nothing to the conversation, and is usually called a waste of time.