That's not what I was trying to say... the incident is clearly the captain's fault since he put the camera there, although the purpose of the SI is not to apportion blame (that would be done via another means, not released to the public). My post was addressing the question of whether the captain was being wilfully dishonest with the inquiry panel by (apparently) not owning up to what he had done and thereby causing the fleet to be unnecessarily grounded, as was inferred by an earlier post. And my point was that his alleged dishonesty might not have actually been wilful.