Originally Posted by
HAL9000
What some call whining others would call valid criticism of the basing solution for a very important contract.
The original basing solution was supposed to have been driven by an in depth study of the required helicopter coverage. This begs the question; in moving the base from Manston to Lydd has the necessary re-evaluation been done?
Obviously, as the taxpayer is both funding the contract and the customer then this information will be freely available ... won't it?
Yes, any whining in the background is an APU.
The UK Gov't is due to pay over £1.6bn for this across the next 11 years, so it better be good.
However, redacted is a bit of a theme throughout the available paperwork.