I am not guilty of intellectual anything.
I gave you a 6 or so sentence response to what is actually a very long report that I read an even longer time ago.
As the captain on one of these aircraft is a very good friend of mine, I was in the loop, if you wish, the day it happened and read his report before it was even submitted to the safety board. He told me and I read if first hand that his main cause of this incident was the bilingual handling of the 2 a/c in question.
If the politically correctors chose to bury the facts as far down as number 13 I have no control over that. That's the way they operate in Canada.
Just as an aside, why was it the RJ crew not understanding French, rather than the metro crew not monitoring and maintaining a listening watch in English that you refer to in number 13?.