I really don't know all the details in this case, but once again you lay yourself open. If the CEO of cancer research UK was taking an excessive salary, I DO think this is important public news. The public give money to a charity to achieve an aim, not for that money to be misused. If charity A and B are receiving the same public donations and one has 48% admin costs against 15%, the public have EVERY right to know. Guess why??????????