CS and KK:
If that is the case, QF should have made far better attempts at being 'quiet' about it. And if they wanted to find a 'source' they could.
Company manuals threaten death for looking sideways if not approved. Why is this instance so different?
And after decades of being blatantly lied to, I cannot accept an 'innocent mistake' excuse.
Print media is particularly swayed by QF drivel. I am biased because I have not seen a single instance in at least the last 5 years of QF behaving honourably. That article was devoid of real factual information - QF could have quashed it easily.
Industrial Relations trial by media?