Dear LeadSled
I'm glad that you're aware of the sites I have been quoting. Could you then refrain from personally attacking people, and attack the argument instead.
It would be far more useful to people if you could explain where you are getting you're information from and why the website/document/etc is incorrect.
The only thing I have quoted is from the website, and have made no assertions or interpretations. I would be pleased if you could direct me to the legislation rather than going on a rant. I'm happy to be proven wrong in the effort to gain more knowledge.
On a personal note I thought of you as a person of high standards who was worthy of listening too. After your personal attack on me I'm no longer sure.
If you wish to go your hardest against me please go ahead, I'll shall not be returning to this thread.