Back on topic, I heard a great quote on radio 4....
"If we did get involved with airstrikes on Syria, what are we really going to achieve"?
They'll still be killing each other regardless.
And after all them years in Iraq and Afghanistan they are no more peaceful, they still have sectarian killings or lawless tribal fighting.
My personal view is chemical weapons are not a "weapon of mass destruction" the AK47 is the true weapon of mass destruction.... ever. You'll find a lot more people have been killed by conventional means in the past months, years even. But call me Dave did not give a toss about intervention back then.
Last edited by gr4techie; 10th Sep 2013 at 12:33.