PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Swiss downsize definite
View Single Post
Old 4th March 2003 | 17:11
  #43 (permalink)  
Robert Vesco
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Embedded in a pocket of resistance
No Skypointer I have not run out of arguments and Iīm sure neither have you. Itīs just that we have said and heard them all before. Iīm sick of writing them down again. Do a search for our usernames and you will come up with my point of view.
For as far as the euro routes are concerned, I agree with S2000 Driver. Too lazy to write it out. If the Saab is too big, then the A320 must be huge (yield and load factor wise) , but strangely nobody even thinks about reducing the number of LuftBusses.

By the way, how well is Long Haul doing ? Nobody knows because Swiss refuses to reveal any relevant (YIELD !!) figures, and likes to concentrate on load figures. "Johannesburg and Rio have a load figures of bla bla bla percent !" Canīt wait to read the next Ernst & Young report on Swiss in a few years.

Letīs just accept that we donīt get along and that the SWISS īBiosphere projectī has failed. We will see what the future might (or might not) bring to us.

Who knows, maybe one day we will sit next to each other during a new job interview, or in the cockpit !

Ciao !
Robert Vesco is offline