@ alogobotur: I do.
I have no clue if it's been published in english, but
here (and also
here) are some comments about it I wrote at the time.
I concur with roulishollandais: the final report is better (but was released later). The book is an analysis based on what looks like (smells like, feels like) a leaded early draft of the CVR transcript.
@ Lonewolf_50 re: "IMO, somatogravatic illusion is a red herring in this particular case." ==>
