Monocock.
You appear to be more involved in this affair than some of us to have received said email.
You appear to know more than you are telling this public forum.
I'm not at all involved in this. In just a member of the flying club at that airfield and have sound knowledge of exactly how it operates from a visitor's perspective. The alleged manner in which the OP was treated is completely uncharacteristic of the place, hence my decision to defend him, and the airfield.
I may be wrong & you know no more than the rest of us
That's correct. The OP's initial account was the first I'd heard of the event.
My email to the person on the radio was completely out of the blue for him and he didn't have to respond to it. But, he did, because he's perfectly reasonable as a person and had the OP been genuinely keen to proactively resolve the issue, he too could have emailed the person himself for a full briefing of what it was he did upon arrival that was wrong.