peterc005
im really curious how juliars carbon tax is supposed to have any effect at all when the revenue collected is almost entirely (supposedly) redistributed to the masses so they can afford to keep buying the taxed goods in the same quantities as before? wealth redistribution by another name.
of course the climate changes. always has, always will. why have you blokes stopped calling it global warming? even if it is warming (which i'm not convinced) how much of that is man induced? that bit i think will not be properly understood or agreed on for quite a few generations yet.
if i was to believe some of the language being used i should be out the back building my arc now.