Hairy Plane, et al
Well as I am obviously not allowed an opinion I m out of this debate. You obvious have no sensible argument against the points I raised so lower yourself to attacking me instead.
I have already twice pointed out that no way did I intend to humiliate Sami but you have chosen to ignore that fact or are able to read my subconcious thoughts that not even I am aware of.
Yes I ve forgtton things I learnt but know where to re-learn them if necessary. Its just a shame that Sami's training and examination was not well enough found for him to have the knowledge he requires. He didn't KNOW the answers, nor had he been TAUGHT where to find them, he hadn't FORGOTTEN them.
If as PIC I infringe LGW airspace because I didn't know how to read a chart, because I hadn't been taught it or was not aware of the need to be taught it, it would be my fault as PIC legally but the failing is with the FI and examiner who not teaching the process and for not realising the fact during the GFT. The examiner is giving you the ability to fly as PIC with pax - if you do not have the knowledge required by the CAA/JAA/FAA etc to pass the exams he has not properly examined you and is negligent in his duty surely?
IN CASE YOU HAVE FORGOTTEN ALREADY I DIDN'T INTEND TO HUMILIATE SAMI JUST QUESTION THE STANDARDS OF TRAINING EXAMINATION.