Musthafa....
I cannot disagree with what you put but isn't the standard of proof in the industrial world the less onerous 'on the balance of probabilities' rather than the criminal standard of 'beyond reasonable doubt'? When evidence in the view of 'the ordinary man' points to guilt, then on the balance of probabilities it is guilt. Thus, if we're not in a criminal court then it's a fair case of 'gotcha' and the culprit must go..... game, set and match. But that doesn't apply to our little Aussie battler.
Pip Pip!!
