PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - British Airways - 2
View Single Post
Old 10th Oct 2012, 18:42
  #2102 (permalink)  
jabird
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Coventry
Age: 48
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cant see 195's being ordered for LGW for 2 reasons
- Increase costs per seat at LGW lends itself to using larger aircraft
Do you have any idea what sort of difference we're talking about? I thought about this coming into DBV with BE, when all the other frames were of the 150 seat variants, but clearly they can still compete in a number of markets where they are using these smaller frames.

I would expect a natural saving through using newer frames, so I was thinking of relative costs versus a newer 320 family.

Easyjet continued focus on business and frequency and hence cost per per seat as above
Well one way to maintain frequency is to operate a smaller fleet on a more intensive basis. However, I can't see that being BA's real priority at LGW, where a lot of routes are more leisure based. Even with the "upgrade to BA" slogan, they still want to keep a tight control on costs, surely?

One other concern would be whether or not GIP would be too happy with one of their biggest clients suddenly operating routes with a c. 120 seat frame when the same markets could be served with 150-189 seaters. Of course, it isn't usually up to the airport to dictate to the airline what sort of fleet to use, but this is Gatwick after all.
jabird is offline