Originally Posted by PJ2
I assume you mean the position of the THS
The information display on the position of the THS is not my point of contention, the information on the THS functioning depending on the laws, sub-laws, or sub-sub-laws, is.
Except from the FDR data, the BEA report is absolutely empty on the matter.
To be told that the THS moved from 3 to 13 degrees in 1 minute or that the THS moved accordingly to the stick inputs and as designed is vastly insufficient.
The "influence of the THS" argument has been demonstrated as a non-starter.
Far from it.
Owain Glyndwr made
very interesting comments which should have been already part of a final report. The BEA had all the necessary tools to elaborate further on the subject.
- 3 degrees versus 13 ?
- No autotrim versus autotrim ?
- Direct Law versus Altn36Z ?
Owain Glyndwr comments are necessary and welcome. They deserve further analysis but are certainly not already the conclusion to avoid looking in that direction.
Why not trimming in a stall ?
You’ve been asked
the question.
You did not reply ... ?