Virgnexcess, sorry for taking so long to respond, had to re-read your post which has been retrospectively edited, like a certain website that has had their media release retrospectively edited. I think this may fit into an example you are looking for.
Also, a certain update to members regarding RSV48 was factually incorrect in its substance.
Shall I keep going?
Last edited by dirty deeds; 30th Sep 2012 at 12:26.