PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Suspicion of being under the Influence
View Single Post
Old 7th Aug 2012, 00:33
  #58 (permalink)  
neville_nobody
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,079
Received 151 Likes on 66 Posts
Ironically CASA announced their testing results the same day someone is allegedly caught. .08% Strike rate of ALL workers in 4 years.

Be aware of the bias in this story as CASA do not mention how many convictions were held up in court. The story states how many people were caught but does not say how many people were actually convicted. Big difference. Just because you were caught by CASA does not mean you are guilty.

Pity CASA don't release the conviction stats as I would suggest you would be in to a thousandths of a percentile.

Also goes to show how poor reporting is this days they just publish press releases verbatim

Is CASA DAMP funding under review by chance?

The pilots' union believes the alcohol-testing regime for its members and other workers in the airline industry, including engineers and baggage handlers, is sufficient because the rate of positive recordings is "infinitesimally low".
Australia's air-safety regulator also released figures today showing that only 45 people out of 51,000 tested for drugs and alcohol between late 2008 – when the regime was implemented – and March this year recorded positive readings.
The Civil Aviation and Safety Authority's random testing covers anyone who "touches an aircraft", including pilots, engineers, cabin crew and baggage handlers.
A spokesman for CASA, Peter Gibson, said that the regulator had pursued legal action against some of those who had recorded a positive reading.
Advertisement
The Herald revealed today that Qantas has launched an investigation after one of its captains recorded a positive test for alcohol last week. She was removed from command of a Boeing 767-300 last Monday at Sydney Airport after cabin crew suspected she had been drinking before the flight.
Several industry insiders said today that the aviation industry had a "drink-driven culture".
But Richard Woodward, the vice-president of the Australian and International Pilots Association, said he did not believe that CASA's random drug and alcohol testing, as well as the airline's own programs, were in need of an overhaul because the rate of positive recordings in the industry was "infinitesimally low".
Although he conceded that social drinking was a "strong element" of the industry, he said that in the 25 years he had been an airline pilot "the populous has changed".
"The pilots as a body are healthier than they have ever been. Sure, they might meet in a bar for a drink before they go to dinner ... but I would put that in perspective," he said.
Mr Woodward, an A380 Qantas captain, cited statistics from the US showing the number of flights disrupted because of positive recordings for alcohol or drugs was about 100 over a five-year period, in a country in which 15,000 flights were made each day.
He described that rate as "not even a measurable statistic".
"The probability of someone testing positive in the States is infinitesimally low. We don't see any requirement to increase the testing [in Australia]," he said. "There is always targeted testing if there has been some information to lead authorities to believe an individual needs it."
Mr Woodward said the follow-up regime for those who recorded a positive alcohol reading was strict, and "if someone has a genuine issue they end up retiring from our profession".


Read more: Pilot drinking breaches 'infinitesimally low': union

Last edited by neville_nobody; 7th Aug 2012 at 00:42.
neville_nobody is offline