The purpose of this thread was to reiterate a continuation or hardening up of what has always been our policy in regard to ANY subject, not to start another discussion.
'89 is very obviously and will remain, a very open wound for many of us for a long time.
It is NOT my job to decide which way or who was right, other than keep it under the bounds of civilised control.
It is NOT my intention to debate the issue, nor is it necessary for ME to be convinced of the "rightness or not" of either case.
My ONLY job is to keep it civil and within the bounds of decency required by the rules and the "Ten Thingies".
I am closing this thread because it is already starting up again, if you want to continue the discussion then you know how it's done.
I would invite you to reflect on john_tullamarine and Raw Datas ' posts.
They are both experienced and respected Moderators in their respective Forums.