You are agreeing with whom? Who said/wrote that official reports have to be accepted unquestioningly?
If there is a conclusion in the report, there must be a method described which led to it. This method has to be scrutable and found to be valid. Otherwise, it's not a report but rather a pamphlet.
Science is not a cult! It is not scientific if scientist says so. It is scientific if it is open to independent validation and confirmation (or disproving, if you're into Popper)