Hi,
CONF iture:
Another relevant '"input" that could partially explain PF, PM and Captain attitudes.
Their (crew) "processors output" very probably will be understood. The output was not random. There were clear bias. The "input" of this memo to them could have biased their actions since the beginning. And during a significant part of the stall. Even during the zoom climb.
Also perhaps affecting the "model" PF made and used in doing "persistent NU".
At default to specifically train in the simulator, that memo should have stated the necessary steps :
"Sachon contenir l'effet de suprise"
