As you are battling as per 'gobble.d', hows this for affirmatiom that CASA is seriously negligent and deficient...
I posted this statement in full elsewhere but it is an admission from CASA itself that the regs are a clusterfcuk.." difficult to interpret, understand and enforce".. "ambiguous and prescriptive" Not sure about the enforcement bit.
The coroner posted the question, since CASA have been "re-writing" the regs since 1997, and (he's) not advised of any outcomes...is that statement an indictment of CASA.?
Because of reg rubbish and the mish-mash of inconsistent interpretations, what hope is there for joe blow when they can't even work it out.
The only way forward is to bin the lot and get rid of the people that spew up this stuff.
And adopt the NZ or FAA.