I think a number of people, including the author of the article at the link posted by LeadSled, are making the (fairly common) mistake of conflating maximum demonstrated crosswind and maximum crosswind limitation.
And this, from the linked article, is champagne comedy:
The Australian Government Solicitor is acting for CASA in the Polar matter, and Comsure is not mentioned as a party, suggesting that if CASA is found to have a liability, it is uninsured.
