Having just go back to Blighty and bought myself said mag, I must state my dissapointment with the article.
Under the impression it was an interview thingy like Cosmo's 'Man of the Month', I thought it'd be a balanced piece.
Apologies, therefore, for my first post. I'm sure (knowing Mental) that it was all Tongue-in-cheek, but it doesn't appear on paper like it. I'll take it in the spirit that I'm sure it was meant, not how GQ thought it'd be amusing to portray.
As I said earlier, all brands of the the armed forces are doing some good stuff at the moment, and to me that's what's important
