Peter, how can you stand behind something that by its very name, is a lie.
It is not a Carbon Tax, it is a tax on carbon dioxide. It does not tax the sooty emissions that the name implies (and the fraudulent advertising reinforces).
Has it ever crossed your mind to question the lie? Does it not make you suspicious that they are so deceitful?
As much as I hate to reference him, I think that everyone really needs to ask the Andrew Bolt question, "By how much will this reduce the Earth's temperature and at what cost?"
No doubt the use of the Bolt name will fire up the left wing idealogues, but nevertheless, the question is valid.