Does anyone out there know where our good friend Senator Xenophon is at with the QSA Amendment?
And while I'm here:
Originally Posted by Qantas Sales Act 1992
change of its company name to a name that does not include
the expression “Qantas”; and
prohibit Qantas from conducting scheduled international air
transport passenger services under a name other than:
(i) its company name; or
(ii) a registered business name that includes the expression
“Qantas”; and
require that the head office of Qantas always be located in
Australia; and
require that of the facilities, taken in aggregate, which are
used by Qantas in the provision of scheduled international
air transport services (for example, facilities for the
maintenance and housing of aircraft, catering, flight
operations, training and administration), the facilities located
in Australia, when compared with those located in any other
country, must represent the principal operational centre for
Qantas; and...
If that is not in black and white, what the hell is? In a court of law I don't think AJ would be looking so smug. If nothing else, they are definitely in breach of the "intent" of the QSA when it was written.