Although he presents himself as an expert debunker of environmental myths, Philip Stott does not appear to have had a single paper published in a scientific journal in the fields in which he most frequently applies this 'expertise', eg climate change or tropical ecology. His views are also generally at odds with the scientific consensus on such issues. (see Jeff Harvey's comments on Prof Stott's lack of relevant scientific credentials)
This just goes on and on.
Skeptics of science can always ferret out a 'dissenter' and pin their hopes on having picked the 'right horse'. As a Biogeographer, Philip Stott has considerable expertise in plant and animal distributions. Those subjects are minor parts of the overall knowledge on climate change and global warming.
This is my final offering to this thread. Thanks for reading my post.
