G'day RRR,
Your link is for the "Land after" procedure, with which I am quite familiar. But I say again that the scenario as I originally posted has nothing to do with a land after, which is specific to No2 landing behind No1 arriving. What we are looking at in my example is clearly a "land after the departing" which is totally different. No2 lands behind no1 departing/roling. I re-state that this is NOT approved at all but a few places. Have a look at this archive link:
Land After Procedure [Archive] - PPRuNe Forums
Lissart