Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Go Around and SOP's

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Go Around and SOP's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd October 2011 | 09:24
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: UK
Hi Lissart,

The worst case scenario is if you go around late with the departing aircraft already past V1. You will not be able to see him once you've rotated, and the gap between you is closing.

If the departing aircraft does reject the take off, the minimum distance between you landing and him being below V1 should not be less than 1500m (at STN). You should be able to land and reduce your speed to below his V1 speed within 1500m, your separation will then increase.

The chance of him rejecting the take off is less that him continuing to get airborne so continuing to land is the safer option.

I tend to agree with most of Dani's posts.
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd October 2011 | 10:38
  #22 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
Originally Posted by rrat
You will not be able to see him once you've rotated, and the gap between you is closing.
As Capn Bloggs syas
As for the GA manoeuvre, would it be the same as at flight-school
- should have been taught to you at the PPL stage?
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd October 2011 | 11:31
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: UK
Hi BOAC,
should have been taught to you at the PPL stage?
I'd be tracking the runway centreline, wings level during the initial stages of the GA and rotate to about 15 degs nose up - I would almost certainly loose sight of him initially.

How would you do your PPL GA to maintain constant visual contact?
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd October 2011 | 11:56
  #24 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
Most of us would retain visual contact! Were you never taught? I take it you have never been in that situation. I hope that anxiety in even the dullest pilot would find a practical solution.
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd October 2011 | 19:17
  #25 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: France
Gents,

The side step idea - either left or right depending on who is the pilot flying - in order to retain visual contact with the departure, is all very well until one considers that at some regional airports, you've got that helicopter circuit active to one side of the runway and you are just about to fly right through it.........!

Just a thought to make an improbable scenario even more scary. Or is it?? (Improbable I mean.....)

Lissart
Lissart is offline  
Reply
Old 24th October 2011 | 10:26
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: UK
Hi BOAC,
Most of us would retain visual contact!
We tried.
Were you never taught?
Yes.
I take it you have never been in that situation.
I have been in that situation once before & I don't intend to do it again.
I hope that anxiety in even the dullest pilot would find a practical solution.
There was lots of anxiety - I assure you - we were sitting in it.
We lost contact during the initial stages of the GA, side stepped to the right and had a window full of aircraft tail. Please explain how you would find a practical solution.
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Reply
Old 24th October 2011 | 10:55
  #27 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
Originally Posted by rrat
We lost contact during the initial stages of the GA, side stepped to the right and had a window full of aircraft tail. Please explain how you would find a practical solution.
Unfortunately it is not of one's choosing when you might say I "don't intend to do it again".

Not quite sure how moving off the runway c/line gave you a 'window full of a/c tail"?
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 24th October 2011 | 13:42
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: UK
Hi BOAC,

We started the GA just below 50 radio and received landing clearance about 3 seconds later.

Not quite sure how moving off the runway c/line gave you a 'window full of a/c tail"?
The departing Aircraft out climbed our TriStar, so looking out of the Left window the tail seemed ever so close. If I'm placed in the same situation again - I'll continue to Land.

Still standing by for your "practical solution".
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Reply
Old 25th October 2011 | 21:07
  #29 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Not cleared? I would not land! Go-around! The ATC will call you and if there's any risk with the aircraft ahead he'll give you a heading; radar vectors and make another approach.
FBW390 is offline  
Reply
Old 27th October 2011 | 07:58
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: UK
Hi OK465,
I 'spect the SOIA procedures to SFO 28L & 28R would be a little nerve wracking for you.
Those were perfectly OK since we were both locked onto separate parallel Localisers. From memory - if we went around from those approaches - don't we change onto diverging headings?

When the aircraft ahead was slower to line up & take off than the controller expected, we were both on the same runway track and visibly closing.
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.