PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - AUGUST 24th - QANTAS
View Single Post
Old 25th Aug 2011, 10:48
  #691 (permalink)  
QAN_Shareholder
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Xenophon Speech

Senator XENOPHON (South Australia) (19:37): I rise to speak tonight on an issue that is close to the hearts of many Australians, and that is the future of our national carrier, Qantas. At 90, Qantas is the world's oldest continuously running airline. It is an iconic Australian company. Its story is woven into the story of Australia and Australians have long taken pride in the service and safety standards provided by our national carrier. Who didn't feel a little proud when Dustin Hoffman uttered the immortal line in Rain Man, 'Qantas never crashed'?

While it is true that Qantas never crashes, the sad reality is that Qantas is being deliberately trashed by management in the pursuit of short-term profits and at the expense of its workers and passengers. For a long time, Qantas management has been pushing the line that Qantas international is losing money and that Jetstar is profitable. Tonight, it is imperative to expose those claims for the misinformation they are. The reality is that Qantas has long been used to subsidise Jetstar in order to make Jetstar look profitable and Qantas look like a burden. In a moment, I will provide detailed allegations of cost-shifting that I have sourced from within the Qantas Group, and when you know the facts you quickly see a pattern. When there is a cost to be paid, Qantas pays it, and when there is a profit to be made, Jetstar makes it.

But first we need to ask ourselves: why? Why would management want Qantas to look unprofitable? Why would they want to hide the cost of a competing brand within their group, namely Jetstar, in amongst the costs faced by Qantas?

To understand that, you need to go back to the days when Qantas was being privatised. When Qantas was privatised the Qantas Sale Act 1992 imposed a number of conditions, which in turn created a number of problems for any management group that wanted to flog off parts of the business. Basically, Qantas has to maintain its principal place of operations here in Australia, but that does not stop management selling any subsidiaries, which brings us to Jetstar.
This is beyond delusional, to paraphrase this argument:

Qantas international is hugely profitable, and there is a queue of foreigners desperate to buy it, but they can't because of the Qantas Sale Act. So management want to shift it all offshore so then it isn't covered by the act and it can be sold.

In reality the part of Qantas that is attractive to any foreign airline would be the domestic business and frequent flyer, and it is kind of difficult to shift the domestic business offshore.
QAN_Shareholder is offline