Originally Posted by jcjeant
This is a judiciary investigation under progress ..
They will have the FDR data .. so it's not left in BEA and Airbus hands only.
As Airbus have them, why not the victim's families ... ?
Originally Posted by HM
And as before, pretty well every post of mine will point to the sidestick culture.. so many downsides and the more we look at this (admittedly strange& hopefully rare) accident the more one can't imagine it ever happening with a fully visible and centred control device... whatever that may be.
Amen.
Now, would you expect any FINDING in such line of thought in the Final Report ?
Diversification and
A33Zab,
Thanks for your documented replies.
Nevertheless, let me quote the D-AXLA report on P92 :
When the real angle of attack increased, the blockage of AOA sensors 1 and 2 at similar values caused the rejection of the ADR 3 anemometric values
In the AF447 case, there is an open door for ADR 1 anemometric values rejection.
Other BEA omission :
As
initially reported by
A33Zab.
And as
further questioned later on.
Anyone ?